Suppr超能文献

单纯干针疗法与运动疗法联合治疗与其他干预措施比较,用于减轻肩峰下疼痛综合征疼痛和残疾的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Dry Needling Alone or in Combination with Exercise Therapy versus Other Interventions for Reducing Pain and Disability in Subacromial Pain Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Physiotherapy Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Católica de Murcia, 30107 Murcia, Spain.

Health Sciences Department, Campus de los Jerónimos, Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia (UCAM), Carretera de Guadalupe s/n, 30107 Murcia, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 2;19(17):10961. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710961.

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the effects of dry needling alone or in combination with exercise therapy for reducing pain and disability in people with subacromial pain syndrome. Systematic searches of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were performed in five different databases. A meta-analysis was carried out with the data obtained, and the risk of bias and quality of the studies was assessed using the Cochrane ROB 2.0 and GRADE tools. Finally, five RCTs ( = 315) were included in the meta-analysis and qualitative analysis. Our results determine that dry needling alone or combined with exercise therapy showed improvements in pain in the short-term (5RCTs: SMD: -0.27; [-0.49, -0.05]; low-quality) and mid-term (4RCTs: SMD: -0.27; [-0.51, -0.04]; low-quality) compared to a range of interventions. However, no differences were shown for disability at short-term (3 RCTs: SMD: -0.97; [-2.04, 0.11]; very-low quality) and mid-term (3 RCTs: SMD: -0.85; [-1.74, 0.04]; very-low quality). Dry needling alone or in combination with exercise therapy may result in a slight reduction in pain in the short-term and mid-term. However, the evidence about the effect of this therapy on disability in the short- or mid-term is very uncertain compared to the range of interventions analyzed in this systematic review (Registration: INPLASY202260112).

摘要

本系统评价和荟萃分析研究了单纯干针疗法或联合运动疗法治疗肩峰下疼痛综合征患者疼痛和功能障碍的效果。在五个不同数据库中进行了系统的随机临床试验 (RCT) 检索。对获得的数据进行了荟萃分析,并使用 Cochrane ROB 2.0 和 GRADE 工具评估了研究的偏倚风险和质量。最终,五项 RCT(n = 315)被纳入荟萃分析和定性分析。我们的研究结果表明,与多种干预措施相比,单纯干针疗法或联合运动疗法在短期(5 项 RCT:SMD:-0.27;[-0.49,-0.05];低质量)和中期(4 项 RCT:SMD:-0.27;[-0.51,-0.04];低质量)均可减轻疼痛。然而,在短期(3 项 RCT:SMD:-0.97;[-2.04,0.11];极低质量)和中期(3 项 RCT:SMD:-0.85;[-1.74,0.04];极低质量),干针疗法单独或联合运动疗法在残疾方面并无差异。单纯干针疗法或联合运动疗法可能会在短期和中期略微减轻疼痛。然而,与本系统评价中分析的多种干预措施相比,这种疗法在短期或中期对残疾的效果证据非常不确定(注册:INPLASY202260112)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f069/9518516/9e23860fe0c4/ijerph-19-10961-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验