Suppr超能文献

用于耳廓假体的骨整合植入物:自体修复的替代方案。

Osseointegrated implants for auricular prostheses: An alternative to autologous repair.

作者信息

Ryan Marisa A, Khoury Tawfiq, Kaylie David M, Crowson Matthew G, Brown C Scott, McClennen Jay, Raynor Eileen M

机构信息

Division of Head and Neck Surgery and Communication Sciences, Department of Surgery, Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina, U.S.A.

Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A.

出版信息

Laryngoscope. 2018 Sep;128(9):2153-2156. doi: 10.1002/lary.27128. Epub 2018 Feb 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: This study compares the hospital cost of osseointegrated implants for retention of an auricular prosthesis to autologous ear reconstruction.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

METHODS

This study includes patients who underwent reconstruction for either congenital or acquired ear defects at Duke University Medical Center during 2009 to 2015.

RESULTS

A total of nine patients had autologous repair representing nine operative ears, and 16 patients had an osseointegrated implant representing 18 operative ears (two bilateral). The average age for the autologous repair was 11.6 years with 56% male versus 40.7 years with 56% male for the osseointegrated implant patients. For autologous patients, indications for surgery were anotia/microtia in 8/9 (89%) and trauma in 1/9 (11%) versus 6/16 (387.5%) anotia/microtia, 8/16 (50%) cancer, and 2/16 (132.5%) trauma in the osseointegrated implant group. The mean number of surgeries was 3.1 for autologous repairs and 1.0 for osseointegrated repairs (mean difference confidence interval [CI]: -2.4 to -1.8, P < .001). The average cost to the hospital for an osseointegrated repair was $6,491.39 versus $10,047.93 for autologous repairs (CI: $6,496.38 to $-616.68, P = .02) CONCLUSIONS: Osseointegrated implants for retaining an auricular prosthesis has a similar cost to autologous repair of ear defects, but patients underwent an average of two more surgeries with autologous repair. Patients should be able to choose the reconstruction option that best suits their condition and preferences.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

  1. Laryngoscope, 128:2153-2156, 2018.
摘要

目的/假设:本研究比较了使用骨整合植入物固定耳廓假体与自体耳再造的住院费用。

研究设计

回顾性研究。

方法

本研究纳入了2009年至2015年期间在杜克大学医学中心接受先天性或后天性耳缺损重建手术的患者。

结果

共有9例患者进行了自体修复,涉及9只手术耳,16例患者使用了骨整合植入物,涉及18只手术耳(2例双侧)。自体修复组的平均年龄为11.6岁,男性占56%;骨整合植入物组的平均年龄为40.7岁,男性占56%。对于自体修复患者,手术指征为8/9(89%)为小耳畸形/无耳畸形,1/9(11%)为外伤;而在骨整合植入物组中,6/16(37.5%)为小耳畸形/无耳畸形,8/16(50%)为癌症,2/16(12.5%)为外伤。自体修复的平均手术次数为3.1次,骨整合修复为1.0次(平均差异置信区间[CI]:-2.4至-1.8,P < .001)。骨整合修复的平均住院费用为6491.39美元,自体修复为10047.93美元(CI:6496.38美元至-616.68美元,P = .02)。结论:使用骨整合植入物固定耳廓假体的费用与自体修复耳缺损相似,但自体修复患者平均多接受两次手术。患者应能够选择最适合其病情和偏好的重建方案。

证据水平

4。《喉镜》,128:2153 - 2156,2018年。

相似文献

10
Auricular Prostheses in Microtia.小耳畸形的耳廓假体
Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2018 Feb;26(1):97-104. doi: 10.1016/j.fsc.2017.09.007.

引用本文的文献

4
Outcome measures in facial prosthesis research: A systematic review.面部修复体研究中的结果测量指标:系统评价。
J Prosthet Dent. 2021 Dec;126(6):805-815. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.09.010. Epub 2021 Feb 10.

本文引用的文献

7
State birth defects surveillance program directory.国家出生缺陷监测项目名录。
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2007 Dec;79(12):815-73. doi: 10.1002/bdra.20427.
10
Total reconstruction of the external ear.外耳的完全重建。
Plast Reconstr Surg Transplant Bull. 1959 Jan;23(1):1-15. doi: 10.1097/00006534-195901000-00001.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验