Risk Anal. 2018 Sep;38(9):1820-1829. doi: 10.1111/risa.12978. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
Ethical analysis is often needed in the preparation of policy decisions on risk. A three-step method is proposed for performing an ethical risk analysis (eRA). In the first step, the people concerned are identified and categorized in terms of the distinct but compatible roles of being risk-exposed, a beneficiary, or a decisionmaker. In the second step, a more detailed classification of roles and role combinations is performed, and ethically problematic role combinations are identified. In the third step, further ethical deliberation takes place, with an emphasis on individual risk-benefit weighing, distributional analysis, rights analysis, and power analysis. Ethical issues pertaining to subsidiary risk roles, such as those of experts and journalists, are also treated in this phase. An eRA should supplement, not replace, a traditional risk analysis that puts emphasis on the probabilities and severities of undesirable events but does not cover ethical issues such as agency, interpersonal relationships, and justice.
在制定风险政策决策时,通常需要进行伦理分析。本文提出了一种三步法来进行伦理风险分析(eRA)。在第一步中,根据风险暴露者、受益者或决策者的不同但兼容的角色,对相关人员进行识别和分类。在第二步中,对角色和角色组合进行更详细的分类,并确定存在伦理问题的角色组合。在第三步中,进行进一步的伦理思考,重点是个人风险-收益权衡、分配分析、权利分析和权力分析。在这一阶段,还涉及到附属风险角色的伦理问题,如专家和记者的角色。eRA 应该补充而不是替代传统的风险分析,传统的风险分析强调不良事件的概率和严重程度,但不包括代理、人际关系和正义等伦理问题。