Sadeghi Kourosh, Hamishehkar Hadi, Najmeddin Farhad, Ahmadi Arezoo, Hazrati Ebrahim, Honarmand Hooshyar, Mojtahedzadeh Mojtaba
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Drug Applied Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Infect Drug Resist. 2018 Feb 13;11:223-228. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S150839. eCollection 2018.
To achieve target concentrations, the application of higher-than-standard doses of amikacin is proposed for the treatment of sepsis due to an increase in volume of distribution and clearance, but little data are available on aminoglycoside administration in critically ill elderly patients.
Forty critically ill elderly patients (aged over 65 years) who required amikacin therapy due to severe documented, or suspected gram-negative infections, were randomly assigned to two treatment groups. Group A (20 patients) received 15 mg/kg amikacin and Group B (20 patients) received 25 mg/kg amikacin per day as a single daily dose. All the patients were monitored for renal damage by the daily monitoring of serum creatinine. The amikacin peak (C) and trough (C) serum concentrations were measured on Days 3 and 7 postadministration.
Data from 18 patients in Group A and 15 patients in Group B were finally analyzed. On Day 3, the amikacin mean C levels in the standard and high-dose treatment groups were 30.4±11 and 52.3±16.1 µg/mL (<0.001), and the C levels were 3.2±2.1 and 5.2±2.8 µg/mL, respectively (=0.035). On Day 7, the C levels in the standard and high-dose groups were 33±7.3 and 60.0±17.6 µg/mL (=0.001), and the C levels were 3.2±2.9 and 9.3±5.6 µg/mL, respectively (=0.002). In only six (40%) of the patients in the high-dose groups and none of the patients in the standard-dose group, amikacin C reached the target levels (>64 µg/mL), whereas the amikacin mean C levels in the high-dose group were above the threshold of toxicity (5 µg/mL).
Our results suggest that the optimum dose of amikacin should be determined for elderly critically ill patients. It seems that higher-than-standard doses of amikacin with more extended intervals might be more appropriate than standard once-daily dosing in the elderly critically ill patients.
为达到目标浓度,鉴于分布容积和清除率增加,建议应用高于标准剂量的阿米卡星治疗败血症,但关于危重症老年患者氨基糖苷类药物给药的数据很少。
40例因严重确诊或疑似革兰阴性菌感染而需要阿米卡星治疗的危重症老年患者(年龄超过65岁)被随机分为两个治疗组。A组(20例患者)每日接受15mg/kg阿米卡星,B组(20例患者)每日接受25mg/kg阿米卡星,均为单次给药。通过每日监测血清肌酐对所有患者的肾损害情况进行监测。在给药后第3天和第7天测量阿米卡星的血清峰浓度(Cmax)和谷浓度(Cmin)。
最终分析了A组18例患者和B组15例患者的数据。在第3天,标准剂量组和高剂量组的阿米卡星平均Cmax水平分别为30.4±11和52.3±16.1μg/mL(P<0.001),Cmin水平分别为3.2±2.1和5.2±2.8μg/mL(P=0.035)。在第7天,标准剂量组和高剂量组的Cmax水平分别为33±7.3和60.0±17.6μg/mL(P=0.001),Cmin水平分别为3.2±2.9和9.3±5.6μg/mL(P=0.002)。高剂量组中仅6例(40%)患者的阿米卡星Cmax达到目标水平(>64μg/mL),而标准剂量组无患者达到;然而,高剂量组的阿米卡星平均Cmax水平高于毒性阈值(5μg/mL)。
我们的结果表明,应针对老年危重症患者确定阿米卡星的最佳剂量。对于老年危重症患者,高于标准剂量且给药间隔更长的阿米卡星似乎比标准的每日一次给药更合适。