• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

更为相似而非不同:儿童基本数学技能的性别差异是例外而非规律。

More Similar Than Different: Gender Differences in Children's Basic Numerical Skills Are the Exception Not the Rule.

机构信息

University of Western Ontario.

Georgetown University.

出版信息

Child Dev. 2019 Jan;90(1):e66-e79. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13044. Epub 2018 Feb 27.

DOI:10.1111/cdev.13044
PMID:29484644
Abstract

This study investigates gender differences in basic numerical skills that are predictive of math achievement. Previous research in this area is inconsistent and has relied upon traditional hypothesis testing, which does not allow for assertive conclusions to be made regarding nonsignificant findings. This study is the first to compare male and female performance (N = 1,391; ages 6-13) on many basic numerical tasks using both Bayesian and frequentist analyses. The results provide strong evidence of gender similarities on the majority of basic numerical tasks measured, suggesting that a male advantage in foundational numerical skills is the exception rather than the rule.

摘要

本研究调查了对数学成绩具有预测性的基本数学技能方面的性别差异。这一领域的先前研究结果不一致,并且依赖于传统的假设检验,这使得对于非显著发现无法做出有把握的结论。本研究首次使用贝叶斯和频率分析比较了男性和女性在许多基本数值任务上的表现(N=1391;年龄 6-13 岁)。结果提供了强有力的证据表明,在大多数测量的基本数值任务上,性别相似,这表明在基础数值技能方面,男性具有优势是例外而非规则。

相似文献

1
More Similar Than Different: Gender Differences in Children's Basic Numerical Skills Are the Exception Not the Rule.更为相似而非不同:儿童基本数学技能的性别差异是例外而非规律。
Child Dev. 2019 Jan;90(1):e66-e79. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13044. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
2
Gender Differences in Academic Achievement: Is Writing an Exception to the Gender Similarities Hypothesis?学业成绩中的性别差异:写作是性别相似性假设的一个例外吗?
J Genet Psychol. 2015 May-Aug;176(3-4):211-34. doi: 10.1080/00221325.2015.1036833. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
3
Gender equality in 4- to 5-year-old preschoolers' early numerical competencies.4 至 5 岁学龄前儿童早期数学能力中的性别平等。
Dev Sci. 2019 Jan;22(1):e12718. doi: 10.1111/desc.12718. Epub 2018 Sep 2.
4
Young children's core symbolic and nonsymbolic quantitative knowledge in the prediction of later mathematics achievement.幼儿的核心符号和非符号数量知识对后期数学成绩的预测作用。
Dev Psychol. 2016 Dec;52(12):2130-2144. doi: 10.1037/dev0000214. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
5
Approximate number sense, symbolic number processing, or number-space mappings: what underlies mathematics achievement?近似数量感、符号数量处理还是数量-空间映射:是什么支撑着数学成就?
J Exp Child Psychol. 2013 Mar;114(3):418-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.10.012. Epub 2012 Dec 25.
6
Mapping numerical magnitudes onto symbols: the numerical distance effect and individual differences in children's mathematics achievement.将数字大小映射到符号上:数字距离效应与儿童数学成绩的个体差异。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2009 May;103(1):17-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2008.04.001. Epub 2008 May 29.
7
What basic number processing measures in kindergarten explain unique variability in first-grade arithmetic proficiency?幼儿园的哪些基本数字处理措施可以解释一年级算术熟练程度的独特可变性?
J Exp Child Psychol. 2014 Jan;117:12-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2013.08.010. Epub 2013 Oct 12.
8
Numerical predictors of arithmetic success in grades 1-6.1至6年级算术成绩的数值预测指标。
Dev Sci. 2014 Sep;17(5):714-26. doi: 10.1111/desc.12152. Epub 2014 Feb 28.
9
Preschool executive functioning abilities predict early mathematics achievement.学前执行功能能力预测早期数学成就。
Dev Psychol. 2010 Sep;46(5):1176-1191. doi: 10.1037/a0019672.
10
Early numerical foundations of young children's mathematical development.幼儿数学发展的早期数字基础。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2015 Apr;132:205-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.01.006. Epub 2015 Feb 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Rapid emergence of a maths gender gap in first grade.一年级时数学性别差距迅速显现。
Nature. 2025 Jun 11. doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-09126-4.
2
Gender differences in elementary school students' fraction learning: roles of spatial ability and mathematical anxiety.小学生分数学习中的性别差异:空间能力和数学焦虑的作用
Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 12;15:1464501. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1464501. eCollection 2024.
3
Sex Differences and Similarities in Relations Between Mathematics Achievement, Attitudes, and Anxiety: A Seventh-to-Ninth Grade Longitudinal Study.
数学成绩、态度与焦虑之间关系的性别差异与相似性:一项七至九年级的纵向研究
J Educ Psychol. 2023 Jul;115(5):767-782. doi: 10.1037/edu0000793. Epub 2023 May 11.
4
Spatial-Numerical Magnitude Estimation Mediates Early Sex Differences in the Use of Advanced Arithmetic Strategies.空间-数字大小估计介导了高级算术策略使用中的早期性别差异。
J Intell. 2023 May 18;11(5):97. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11050097.
5
Numeracy Gender Gap in STEM Higher Education: The Role of Neuroticism and Math Anxiety.理工科高等教育中的数字能力性别差距:神经质和数学焦虑的作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 May 26;13:856405. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.856405. eCollection 2022.
6
Sex differences in the association of math achievement with visual-spatial and verbal working memory: Does the type of math test matter?数学成绩与视觉空间和言语工作记忆关联的性别差异:数学测试类型是否重要?
Br J Psychol. 2022 Aug;113(3):798-819. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12562. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
7
Next Directions in Measurement of the Home Mathematics Environment: An International and Interdisciplinary Perspective.家庭数学环境测量的未来方向:国际与跨学科视角
J Numer Cogn. 2021 Jul;7(2):195-220. doi: 10.5964/jnc.6143. Epub 2021 Jul 23.
8
Gender-Based Performance in Mathematical Facts and Calculations in Two Elementary School Samples From Chile and Spain: An Exploratory Study.智利和西班牙两个小学样本中基于性别的数学事实与计算表现:一项探索性研究。
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 17;12:703580. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.703580. eCollection 2021.
9
No Association Between the Home Math Environment and Numerical and Patterning Skills in a Large and Diverse Sample of 5- to 6-year-olds.在一个包含5至6岁儿童的大型多样化样本中,家庭数学环境与数字和模式技能之间不存在关联。
Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 10;11:547626. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.547626. eCollection 2020.
10
A Finger-Based Numerical Training Failed to Improve Arithmetic Skills in Kindergarten Children Beyond Effects of an Active Non-numerical Control Training.一项基于手指的数字训练未能超越积极的非数字对照训练的效果,提高幼儿园儿童的算术技能。
Front Psychol. 2020 Mar 24;11:529. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00529. eCollection 2020.