Hall Sally, Thatje Sven
Ocean and Earth Science, National Oceanography Centre, University of Southampton, European Way, Southampton, SO14 3ZH, UK.
Naturwissenschaften. 2018 Feb 27;105(3-4):19. doi: 10.1007/s00114-018-1544-2.
The objectives of this work are to use gene sequence data to assess the hypothesis that the Lithodinae arose from ancestors with uncalcified abdomens in shallow waters of the North-East Pacific, investigate the monophyly and interrelationships of genera within the Lithodinae and to estimate the scale and minimum number of biogeographic transitions from the shallow environment to the deep sea and vice versa. To do this, phylogenetic analysis from three mitochondrial and three nuclear markers was conducted using minimum evolution, maximum likelihood and Bayesian methods. The Lithodinae as defined to include North Pacific genus Cryptolithodes may be paraphyletic, with the Hapalogastrinae and Cryptolithodes as sister taxa. This implies that the soft-bodied abdomen of the Hapalogastrinae might not be plesiomorphic for the Lithodidae. Paralomis, Lopholithodes, Phyllolithodes, Lithodes and Neolithodes share a common ancestor, from which the North Pacific Hapalogastrinae did not descend. Lithodid ancestors are likely to have had a north Pacific, shallow water distribution and to have had planktotrophic larvae. North Pacific genus Paralithodes is paraphyletic; P. brevipes is the most basal member of the genus (as sampled) while P. camtschaticus and P. platypus are more closely related to the genera Lithodes and Neolithodes. Genera Lithodes, Neolithodes and Paralomis (as sampled) are monophyletic if Glyptolithodes is included within Paralomis. Lopholithodes is closely related to, but not included within, the Paralomis genus. Paralomis is divided into at least two major lineages: one containing South Atlantic, West African, and Indian Ocean species, and the other containing Pacific and South American species. Several species of Paralomis do not resolve consistently with any other groups sampled, implying a complex and possibly rapid global evolution early in the history of the genus. Relationships within the Lithodes genus vary between analytical methods, suggesting that conclusions may not be stable. Consistently, however, Indian Ocean and Pacific forms-L. murrayi, L. longispina and L. nintokuae form a group separated from Atlantic species such as L. santolla, L. confundens, L. maja and L. ferox.
石蟹亚科起源于东北太平洋浅水区腹部未钙化的祖先,研究石蟹亚科内各属的单系性和相互关系,并估计从浅水环境到深海以及相反方向的生物地理过渡的规模和最小数量。为此,使用最小进化法、最大似然法和贝叶斯方法对三个线粒体标记和三个核标记进行了系统发育分析。定义为包括北太平洋隐石蟹属的石蟹亚科可能是并系的,其中单肢石蟹亚科和隐石蟹属为姐妹类群。这意味着单肢石蟹亚科的柔软腹部可能不是石蟹科的原始特征。拟石蟹属、冠石蟹属、叶石蟹属、石蟹属和新石蟹属有一个共同祖先,北太平洋的单肢石蟹亚科并非由此祖先演化而来。石蟹科的祖先可能分布于北太平洋浅水区,且具有浮游生物食性的幼体。北太平洋的拟石蟹属是并系的;短足拟石蟹是该属(所采样的)最基部的成员,而堪察加拟石蟹和宽扁拟石蟹与石蟹属和新石蟹属的关系更为密切。如果将雕石蟹属归入拟石蟹属,那么石蟹属、新石蟹属和拟石蟹属(所采样的)是单系的。冠石蟹属与拟石蟹属关系密切,但不包含在拟石蟹属内。拟石蟹属至少分为两个主要谱系:一个包含南大西洋、西非和印度洋的物种,另一个包含太平洋和南美洲的物种。拟石蟹属的几个物种与所采样的任何其他类群的关系都不一致,这意味着该属在其演化历史早期经历了复杂且可能快速的全球演化。石蟹属内的关系在不同分析方法之间存在差异,这表明结论可能不稳定。然而,印度洋和太平洋的种类——穆氏石蟹、长刺石蟹和仁户石蟹形成一个与大西洋种类如桑托拉石蟹、混淆石蟹、黄斑石蟹和凶猛石蟹分开的类群。