• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年人从急诊科出院后复诊的预测因素和结果。

Predictors and Outcomes of Revisits in Older Adults Discharged from the Emergency Department.

机构信息

Department of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Apr;66(4):735-741. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15301. Epub 2018 Feb 28.

DOI:10.1111/jgs.15301
PMID:29489015
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To study predictors of emergency department (ED) revisits and the association between ED revisits and 90-day functional decline or mortality.

DESIGN

Multicenter cohort study.

SETTING

One academic and two regional Dutch hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

Older adults discharged from the ED (N=1,093).

MEASUREMENTS

At baseline, data on demographic characteristics, illness severity, and geriatric parameters (cognition, functional capacity) were collected. All participants were prospectively followed for an unplanned revisit within 30 days and for functional decline and mortality 90 days after the initial visit.

RESULTS

The median age was 79 (interquartile range 74-84), and 114 participants (10.4%) had an ED revisit within 30 days of discharge. Age (hazard ratio (HR)=0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.92-0.99), male sex (HR=1.61, 95% CI=1.05-2.45), polypharmacy (HR=2.06, 95% CI=1.34-3.16), and cognitive impairment (HR=1.71, 95% CI=1.02-2.88) were independent predictors of a 30-day ED revisit. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve to predict an ED revisit was 0.65 (95% CI=0.60-0.70). In a propensity score-matched analysis, individuals with an ED revisit were at higher risk (odds ratio=1.99 95% CI=1.06-3.71) of functional decline or mortality.

CONCLUSION

Age, male sex, polypharmacy, and cognitive impairment were independent predictors of a 30-day ED revisit, but no useful clinical prediction model could be developed. However, an early ED revisit is a strong new predictor of adverse outcomes in older adults.

摘要

目的

研究急诊科(ED)复诊的预测因素,以及 ED 复诊与 90 天功能下降或死亡之间的关系。

设计

多中心队列研究。

地点

一家学术和两家地区荷兰医院。

参与者

从 ED 出院的老年人(N=1093)。

测量

在基线时,收集了人口统计学特征、疾病严重程度和老年参数(认知、功能能力)的数据。所有参与者均前瞻性随访 30 天内有无计划的复诊,并在初次就诊后 90 天随访功能下降和死亡情况。

结果

中位年龄为 79 岁(四分位距 74-84 岁),114 名患者(10.4%)在出院后 30 天内复诊。年龄(风险比(HR)=0.96,95%置信区间(CI)=0.92-0.99)、男性(HR=1.61,95% CI=1.05-2.45)、多药治疗(HR=2.06,95% CI=1.34-3.16)和认知障碍(HR=1.71,95% CI=1.02-2.88)是 30 天 ED 复诊的独立预测因素。预测 ED 复诊的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为 0.65(95% CI=0.60-0.70)。在倾向评分匹配分析中,ED 复诊患者功能下降或死亡的风险更高(比值比=1.99,95% CI=1.06-3.71)。

结论

年龄、男性、多药治疗和认知障碍是 30 天 ED 复诊的独立预测因素,但无法制定有用的临床预测模型。然而,早期 ED 复诊是老年人不良预后的一个强有力的新预测因素。

相似文献

1
Predictors and Outcomes of Revisits in Older Adults Discharged from the Emergency Department.老年人从急诊科出院后复诊的预测因素和结果。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Apr;66(4):735-741. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15301. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
2
Derivation and preliminary validation of a risk score to predict 30-day ED revisits for sickle cell pain.用于预测镰状细胞疼痛30天急诊科再就诊风险评分的推导与初步验证
Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Oct;33(10):1396-401. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.07.015. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
3
Patients with acute heart failure discharged from the emergency department and classified as low risk by the MEESSI score (multiple risk estimate based on the Spanish emergency department scale): prevalence of adverse events and predictability.MEESSI 评分(基于西班牙急诊室量表的多风险估计)评估为低风险的急性心力衰竭患者从急诊科出院:不良事件的发生率和可预测性。
Emergencias. 2019 Feb;31(1):5-14.
4
Comprehensive geriatric assessment in the emergency department for the prediction of readmission among older patients: A 3-month follow-up study.急诊科老年综合评估对老年患者再入院的预测作用:一项 3 个月随访研究。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2021 Jan-Feb;92:104255. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2020.104255. Epub 2020 Sep 13.
5
Characteristics of revisits of children at risk for serious infections in pediatric emergency care.儿科急诊中高危严重感染儿童复诊的特征。
Eur J Pediatr. 2018 Apr;177(4):617-624. doi: 10.1007/s00431-018-3095-0. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
6
Association Between Physical Therapy in the Emergency Department and Emergency Department Revisits for Older Adult Fallers: A Nationally Representative Analysis.急诊科物理治疗与老年跌倒患者急诊科复诊之间的关联:一项全国代表性分析。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Nov;66(11):2205-2212. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15469. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
7
A clinical prediction model to identify children at risk for revisits with serious illness to the emergency department: A prospective multicentre observational study.一种用于识别有严重疾病急诊复诊风险的儿童的临床预测模型:一项前瞻性多中心观察性研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 15;16(7):e0254366. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254366. eCollection 2021.
8
Implementation and impact analysis of a transitional care pathway for patients presenting to the emergency department with cardiac-related complaints.针对因心脏相关症状到急诊科就诊患者的过渡性护理路径的实施与影响分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug 30;18(1):672. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3482-2.
9
Patient returns to the emergency department: the time-to-return curve.患者返回急诊科:时间返回曲线。
Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Aug;21(8):864-71. doi: 10.1111/acem.12442. Epub 2014 Aug 24.
10
Outcomes after observation stays among older adult Medicare beneficiaries in the USA: retrospective cohort study.美国老年医疗保险受益人的观察期住院结局:回顾性队列研究
BMJ. 2017 Jun 20;357:j2616. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j2616.

引用本文的文献

1
Emergency Department Care Coordination Program for Assisted Living Residents With Dementia: A Qualitative Study.针对患有痴呆症的辅助生活居民的急诊科护理协调项目:一项定性研究。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2526413. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.26413.
2
Assessing Revisit Risk in Emergency Department Patients: Machine Learning Approach.评估急诊科患者的复诊风险:机器学习方法。
JMIR AI. 2025 Aug 7;4:e74053. doi: 10.2196/74053.
3
NOTICE-ED: Nurse or Technician Insights Into Cognitive Evaluations in the Emergency Department.
通知版:护士或技术员对急诊科认知评估的见解
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2025 Aug;73(8):2503-2511. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19578. Epub 2025 Jun 14.
4
Unplanned re-attendance to emergency department of patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome: a situational analysis.全身炎症反应综合征患者非计划性重返急诊科:情境分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Feb 10;25(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12371-y.
5
Perspectives of older patients on the preventability of their unplanned emergency department return visit within 30 days in the Netherlands: a multicentre mixed methods study.荷兰老年患者对其30天内非计划重返急诊科可预防性的看法:一项多中心混合方法研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 2;15(1):e088972. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088972.
6
An emergency department transitional care team prevents unnecessary hospitalization of older adults: a mixed methods study.急诊科过渡护理团队可防止老年人不必要的住院:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Aug 8;24(1):668. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05260-2.
7
Assessing dynamical resilience indicators in older adults: a prospective feasibility cohort study.评估老年人的动态恢复力指标:一项前瞻性可行性队列研究。
Eur Geriatr Med. 2024 Apr;15(2):445-451. doi: 10.1007/s41999-023-00904-9. Epub 2024 Jan 27.
8
Emergency Department-to-Community Transitions of Care: Best Practices for the Older Adult Population.急诊科到社区的过渡护理:老年人群的最佳实践。
Clin Geriatr Med. 2023 Nov;39(4):659-672. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2023.05.009. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
9
The risk factors of the 72-h unscheduled return visit admission to emergency department in adults below 50 years old.50 岁以下成年人急诊 72 小时内非计划性再次就诊的风险因素。
Eur J Med Res. 2023 Sep 27;28(1):379. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01317-x.
10
Transitional care interventions to reduce emergency department visits in older adults: A systematic review.减少老年人急诊科就诊的过渡性护理干预措施:一项系统评价。
Belitung Nurs J. 2022 Jun 28;8(3):187-196. doi: 10.33546/bnj.2100. eCollection 2022.