Ghosh A K, Spriggs A I, Charnock M
J Clin Pathol. 1986 Dec;39(12):1335-9. doi: 10.1136/jcp.39.12.1335.
Specimens of peritoneal fluid or peritoneal washings from a series of 106 patients who had had laparotomy or laparoscopy for gynaecological complaints were studied "blind" by conventional cytology and immunocytochemical staining. The antibodies used were Ca 1 or Ca 2, anti-CEA, and HMFG-2 or E29. All these are directed against epithelial antigens and are expressed on most malignant epithelial cells and weakly or not at all on mesothelial cells. It was hoped that these reactions would confirm diagnoses made by conventional cytology and possibly show malignant cells which had not already been identified. Of 28 patients with malignant disease (chosen to exclude any with frank ascites), eight gave positive immunochemical reactions, only four having been reported positive from conventional examination. Of 77 patients without malignant disease, HMFG-2 or E29 gave positive reactions in seven, Ca 1 or Ca 2 in two, and anti-CEA in two (reactions with plasma cells being disregarded). Some misleading reactions were probably due to endometrial cells. It was concluded that the antibodies used in this study are not sufficiently specific or sensitive to allow immunocytochemical staining to replace conventional cytological diagnosis but are a useful supplementary aid.
对因妇科疾病接受剖腹手术或腹腔镜检查的106例患者的腹膜液或腹膜冲洗液标本,采用传统细胞学和免疫细胞化学染色进行“盲法”研究。所用抗体为Ca 1或Ca 2、抗癌胚抗原(CEA)以及HMFG-2或E29。所有这些抗体均针对上皮抗原,在大多数恶性上皮细胞上表达,而在间皮细胞上表达微弱或不表达。希望这些反应能证实传统细胞学做出的诊断,并可能显示尚未识别的恶性细胞。在28例恶性疾病患者(选择排除有明显腹水的患者)中,8例免疫化学反应呈阳性,而传统检查仅报告4例阳性。在77例无恶性疾病的患者中,HMFG-2或E29有7例呈阳性反应,Ca 1或Ca 2有2例呈阳性反应,抗CEA有2例呈阳性反应(与浆细胞的反应不予考虑)。一些误导性反应可能是由子宫内膜细胞引起的。结论是,本研究中使用的抗体特异性和敏感性不足,不能使免疫细胞化学染色取代传统细胞学诊断,但可作为一种有用的辅助手段。