Department of Urology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, USA.
Int Braz J Urol. 2018 May-Jun;44(3):524-535. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0575.
Ureteral access sheaths (UAS) facilitate flexible ureteroscopy in the treatment of urolithiasis. The physical properties of UAS vary by manufacturer and model. We compared three new UAS: Glideway (GW, Terumo, 11/13Fr, 12/14Fr), Pathway (PW, Terumo 12/14F) and Navigator HD (NHD, Boston Scientific, 11/13Fr, 12/14Fr) in the domains of safety characteristics, positioning characteristics, lubricity and radioopacity.
In vitro testing of the three UAS included safety testing-tip perforation force, sheath edge deformation and dilator extraction forces. Positioning characteristics tested included tip bending, stiffness (resistance to coaxial buckling forces), kinking (resistance to perpendicular forces), and insertion forces. Lubricity was assessed by measured frictional forces of the outer sheath. Finally, radio-opacity was tested utilizing fluoroscopic imaging of the three 12F sheaths and inner dilators.
The PW (0.245 lb) and GW (0.286 lb) required less force for tip perforation compared to the NHD (0.628 lb). The NHD sheath edge deformation was mild compared to more severe deformation for the PW and GW. The PW (1.008 lb) required greater force than the GW (0.136 lb) and NHD (0.043 lb) for inner dilator removal. The GW (3.69 lbs) and NHD (4.17 lb) had similar inner dilator tip stiffness when bent, while the PW had the weakest inner dilator tip, 1.91 lbs. The PW (0.271 lb) was most susceptible to buckling and kinking (1.626 lb). The most lubricious UAS was the NHD (0.055 lbs for 12F). The NHD (0.277 lbs) required the least insertional force through a biological model and possessed the greatest radio-opacity.
Comparison of different commercially available UAS in various sizes reveals that there are mechanical differences in sheaths that may play a role clinically. The Terumo sheaths' (GW and PW) were outperformed by the Boston Scientific NHD in simulating safety, ease of use and radio-opacity.
输尿管导入鞘(UAS)有助于治疗尿石症的软性输尿管镜检查。UAS 的物理性质因制造商和型号而异。我们比较了三种新的 UAS:Glideway(GW,Terumo,11/13Fr,12/14Fr)、Pathway(PW,Terumo 12/14F)和 Navigator HD(NHD,Boston Scientific,11/13Fr,12/14Fr)在安全特性、定位特性、润滑性和放射性方面。
三种 UAS 的体外测试包括安全测试-尖端穿孔力、鞘边缘变形和扩张器提取力。定位特性测试包括尖端弯曲、刚度(抵抗同轴弯曲力)、扭结(抵抗垂直力)和插入力。润滑性通过测量外鞘的摩擦力来评估。最后,利用三种 12F 鞘和内扩张器的荧光透视成像测试放射性。
与 NHD(0.628 磅)相比,PW(0.245 磅)和 GW(0.286 磅)的尖端穿孔所需力更小。与 PW 和 GW 相比,NHD 的鞘边缘变形较温和。与 GW(0.043 lb)和 NHD(0.043 lb)相比,PW(1.008 lb)去除内扩张器所需的力更大。GW(3.69 磅)和 NHD(4.17 磅)弯曲时内扩张器尖端具有相似的刚度,而 PW 具有最弱的内扩张器尖端,为 1.91 磅。PW(0.271 磅)最容易弯曲和扭结(1.626 磅)。最润滑的 UAS 是 NHD(12F 为 0.055 磅)。NHD(0.277 磅)在生物模型中所需的插入力最小,并且具有最大的放射性。
对不同尺寸的不同市售 UAS 的比较表明,鞘内存在可能在临床上起作用的机械差异。在模拟安全性、易用性和放射性方面,Terumo 鞘(GW 和 PW)逊于 Boston Scientific NHD。