• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

III 型肩锁关节脱位的手术治疗与非手术治疗及 SurgiLig 的应用:一项回顾性研究

Operative Versus Non-operative Treatment of Grade III Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocations and the Use of SurgiLig: a Retrospective Review.

作者信息

Younis Fizan, Ajwani Sanil, Bibi Asia, Riley Eleanor, Hughes Peter J

机构信息

The Royal Blackburn Hospital, East Lancashire NHS Trust, Haslingden Road, Blackburn Trauma and Orthopaedics Department.

Royal Preston Hospital, Sharoe Green Lane, Fulwood, Preston Trauma and Orthopaedics Department.

出版信息

Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2017 Dec 30;19(6):523-530. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0010.8043.

DOI:10.5604/01.3001.0010.8043
PMID:29493522
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acromioclavicular joint dislocations are common shoulder girdle injuries. The treatment of grade III acromioclavicular joint dislocations is controversial. Furthermore, the literature on the use of the Sur-giligTM synthetic ligament for reconstruction of dislocations is sparse.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective review aimed to establish whether operative treatment was superior to non-operative treatment in grade III acromioclavicular joint dislocations treated at our institute over a 5-year period. We also reviewed the effectiveness of reconstruction with SurgiligTM after acute and chronic dislocations across all grades of acromioclavicular joint dislocations.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients completed full follow-up with grade III dislocations. The mean follow-up in the operated group was 3.56 years and in the non-operated group this was 3.29 years. The mean Oxford Shoul-der Score (OSS) in the operated group was 39.8, whereas the mean OSS in the non-operated group was 45.9 (p=0.01). The mean pain score in the operated group was 2.2, and in the non-operated group this was 1.6. The mean satisfaction score in the operated group was 8.2 and that in the non-operated group was 7.8. There was no statistically significant difference in pain or satisfaction scores. In respect to the cohort treated with Surg-iligTM synthetic ligament, 22 patients across all grades of dislocations had this procedure performed. The mean post-operative Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) was 40.

CONCLUSIONS

  1. Non-operative treatment is not inferior to operative treatment for grade III acromioclavicular joint dislocations. The data from this study demonstrat-ed that the non-operated group had superior Ox-ford Shoul-der Scores that were statistically significant. 2. Additionally, the use of the SurgiligTM ligament appears to be effective in treating both chronic and acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations.
摘要

背景

肩锁关节脱位是常见的肩胛带损伤。III度肩锁关节脱位的治疗存在争议。此外,关于使用Sur-giligTM合成韧带重建脱位的文献较少。

材料与方法

本回顾性研究旨在确定在我院接受治疗的III度肩锁关节脱位患者中,手术治疗是否优于非手术治疗,为期5年。我们还回顾了在所有等级的肩锁关节脱位的急性和慢性脱位后使用Sur-giligTM进行重建的有效性。

结果

25例III度脱位患者完成了完整随访。手术组的平均随访时间为3.56年,非手术组为3.29年。手术组的平均牛津肩部评分(OSS)为39.8,而非手术组的平均OSS为45.9(p=0.01)。手术组的平均疼痛评分为2.2,非手术组为1.6。手术组的平均满意度评分为8.2,非手术组为7.8。疼痛或满意度评分无统计学显著差异。对于接受Sur-giligTM合成韧带治疗的队列,所有等级脱位的22例患者接受了该手术。术后平均牛津肩部评分(OSS)为40。

结论

  1. 对于III度肩锁关节脱位,非手术治疗并不劣于手术治疗。本研究数据表明,非手术组的牛津肩部评分更高,具有统计学显著性。2. 此外,使用Sur-giligTM韧带似乎对治疗慢性和急性肩锁关节脱位均有效。

相似文献

1
Operative Versus Non-operative Treatment of Grade III Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocations and the Use of SurgiLig: a Retrospective Review.III 型肩锁关节脱位的手术治疗与非手术治疗及 SurgiLig 的应用:一项回顾性研究
Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2017 Dec 30;19(6):523-530. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0010.8043.
2
Acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint injuries: quality of life comparison between patients managed operatively with a hook plate versus patients managed non-operatively.急性重度肩锁关节损伤:使用钩钢板手术治疗的患者与非手术治疗的患者的生活质量比较
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2017 Apr;27(3):341-350. doi: 10.1007/s00590-016-1862-z. Epub 2016 Oct 12.
3
Modified Weaver-Dunn procedure versus the use of a synthetic ligament for acromioclavicular joint reconstruction.改良韦弗-邓恩手术与使用合成韧带进行肩锁关节重建的比较
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2014 Aug;22(2):199-203. doi: 10.1177/230949901402200217.
4
[Comparison of Tension Banding and Modified Orthocord Sling in Acromioclavicular Dislocation Treatment - Non-Randomized Retrospective Study].[张力带与改良Orthocord吊带治疗肩锁关节脱位的比较——非随机回顾性研究]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2019;86(2):131-135.
5
Conversion to anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction (ACCR) shows similar clinical outcomes compared to successful non-operative treatment in chronic primary type III to V acromioclavicular joint injuries.与成功的非手术治疗相比,对于慢性原发性 III 型至 V 型肩锁关节损伤,转换为解剖型喙锁韧带重建(ACCR)显示出相似的临床结果。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Jul;29(7):2264-2271. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06159-2. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
6
Operative treatment of acute acromioclavicular dislocations Rockwood III and V-Comparative study between K-wires combined with FiberTape(®) vs. TightRope System(®).Rockwood III型和V型急性肩锁关节脱位的手术治疗——克氏针联合FiberTape(®)与TightRope系统(®)的对比研究
Injury. 2015 Nov;46 Suppl 6:S107-12. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.10.053. Epub 2015 Nov 14.
7
Consistency of long-term outcome of acute Rockwood grade III acromioclavicular joint separations after K-wire transfixation.克氏针固定后急性RockwoodⅢ型肩锁关节脱位的长期疗效一致性
J Trauma. 2009 Jun;66(6):1666-71. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31818c1455.
8
[Comparison of therapeutic effects of two internal fixations for the treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocation of Allman Grade III].
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2009 Sep;22(9):650-2.
9
Acromioclavicular joint reconstruction with the LARS ligament in professional versus non-professional athletes.使用LARS韧带对职业运动员与非职业运动员进行肩锁关节重建
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Jun;24(6):1961-7. doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-3231-y. Epub 2014 Aug 23.
10
[Case-control study on measurement of coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular ligament injuries during internal fixation operation for the treatment of fresh acromioclavicular joint dislocation of Tossy type III].[锁骨钩钢板内固定治疗TossyⅢ型新鲜肩锁关节脱位术中喙锁及肩锁韧带损伤测量的病例对照研究]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2014 Jan;27(1):13-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Acromioclavicular Reconstruction Using the Lockdown Technique: A Case Series and Systematic Review.使用锁定技术的肩锁关节重建:病例系列与系统评价
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 7;14(12):4046. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124046.
2
Acromioclavicular joint injuries revisited: Pathoanatomy, pathomechanics, and clinical presentation.肩锁关节损伤再探讨:病理解剖、病理力学及临床表现
Shoulder Elbow. 2022 Oct;14(5):470-480. doi: 10.1177/17585732221122335. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
3
Nonoperative Management of Traumatic Acromioclavicular Joint Injury: A Clinical Commentary with Clinical Practice Considerations.
创伤性肩锁关节损伤的非手术治疗:临床评论及临床实践考量
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2022 Apr 1;17(3):519-540. doi: 10.26603/001c.32545. eCollection 2022.
4
The Infinity-Lock System for Chronic Grade III AC Joint Dislocation: A Novel Technique, Rehabilitation Protocol and Short Term Results.用于慢性Ⅲ度肩锁关节脱位的Infinity-Lock系统:一种新技术、康复方案及短期结果
J Clin Med. 2020 Aug 5;9(8):2519. doi: 10.3390/jcm9082519.
5
The clinical outcome of the 'Surgilig' technique for the reconstruction of acromioclavicular dislocations: A systematic review.“Surgilig”技术重建肩锁关节脱位的临床疗效:一项系统评价
J Orthop. 2019 Sep 11;18:126-131. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2019.09.011. eCollection 2020 Mar-Apr.
6
Current concepts in management of ACJ injuries.肩锁关节损伤管理的当前概念。
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2019 May-Jun;10(3):480-485. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2019.03.020. Epub 2019 Apr 1.