Suppr超能文献

澳大利亚和新西兰透析与移植登记处与澳大利亚国家死亡指数之间的死因比较。

Comparison of cause of death between Australian and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry and the Australian National Death Index.

作者信息

Sypek Matthew P, Dansie Kathryn B, Clayton Phil, Webster Angela C, Mcdonald Stephen

机构信息

ANZDATA, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Nephrology (Carlton). 2019 Mar;24(3):322-329. doi: 10.1111/nep.13250.

Abstract

AIM

The aim of the present study was to understand the differences in how cause of death for patients receiving renal replacement therapy in Australia is recorded in The Australian and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (ANZDATA) compared to the National Death Index (NDI).

METHODS

Data linkage was performed between ANZDATA and NDI for all deaths in the period 1980-2013. Cause of death was classified according to ICD-10 chapter. Overall and chapter specific agreement were assessed using the Kappa statistic. Descriptive analysis was used to explore differences where there was disagreement on primary cause of death.

RESULTS

The analysis cohort included 28 675 patients. Ninety five percent of ANZDATA reported deaths fell within +/- 3 days of the date recorded by NDI. Circulatory death was the most common cause of death in both databases (ANZDATA 48%, NDI 32%). Overall agreement at ICD chapter level of primary cause was poor (36%, kappa 0.22). Agreement was best for malignancy (kappa 0.71). When there was disagreement on primary cause of death these were most commonly coded as genitourinary (35%) and endocrine (25.0%) in NDI, and circulatory (39%) and withdrawal (24%) in ANZDATA. Sixty-nine percent of patients had a renal related cause documented as either primary or a contributing cause of death in the NDI.

CONCLUSION

There is poor agreement in primary cause of death between ANZDATA and NDI which is in part explained by the absence of diabetes and renal failure as causes of death in ANZDATA and the absence of 'withdrawal' in NDI. These differences should be appreciated when interpreting epidemiological data on cause of death in the Australian end stage kidney disease population.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在了解澳大利亚和新西兰透析与移植登记处(ANZDATA)与国家死亡指数(NDI)记录澳大利亚接受肾脏替代治疗患者死因方式的差异。

方法

对1980 - 2013年期间ANZDATA和NDI中所有死亡病例进行数据链接。死因按照国际疾病分类第十版(ICD - 10)章节进行分类。使用Kappa统计量评估总体和各章节特定的一致性。采用描述性分析来探究在主要死因存在分歧的情况下的差异。

结果

分析队列包括28675名患者。ANZDATA报告的死亡病例中,95%发生在NDI记录日期的±3天内。循环系统疾病死亡是两个数据库中最常见的死因(ANZDATA为48%,NDI为32%)。主要死因在ICD章节层面的总体一致性较差(36%,kappa值为0.22)。恶性肿瘤方面的一致性最佳(kappa值为0.71)。当主要死因存在分歧时,在NDI中最常编码为泌尿生殖系统疾病(35%)和内分泌系统疾病(25.0%),而在ANZDATA中则为循环系统疾病(39%)和撤机(24%)。69%的患者在NDI中有肾脏相关病因被记录为主要或促成死因。

结论

ANZDATA和NDI在主要死因方面的一致性较差,部分原因是ANZDATA中没有将糖尿病和肾衰竭列为死因,而NDI中没有“撤机”这一死因。在解读澳大利亚终末期肾病患者死因的流行病学数据时,应认识到这些差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验