• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于.38特种口径子弹和弹壳自动弹道比对有效性的影响因素

Influence Factors Regarding the Effectiveness of Automated Ballistic Comparison on 0.38 Special Caliber Bullets and Cartridge Cases.

作者信息

Dos Santos Lehi Sudy, Vieira Muterlle Palloma

机构信息

Federal Police - National Forensic Institute, SAIS Quadra 07 Lotes 09/10, Asa Sul Brasília, DF, CEP: 70610-200, Brazil.

Materials Laboratory, Brasilia University, Darcy Ribeiro Campus, Bloco SG9, Asa Norte Brasília, CEP: 70910-900, DF, Brazil.

出版信息

J Forensic Sci. 2018 Nov;63(6):1846-1853. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.13771. Epub 2018 Mar 1.

DOI:10.1111/1556-4029.13771
PMID:29495115
Abstract

Factors influencing effectiveness of automated comparisons, test-fired bullets, and cartridge cases from 0.38 Special revolvers were logged into the Evofinder Ballistic ID System. Tests were performed as follows: First test correlated test-fires of the same type, second test compared different types of ammunition components, third test replicated the second test in a larger database, and fourth test replicated the third test with students having no previous firearm identification experience. System effectiveness with projectiles in the first test was 0.89. With cartridge cases, effectiveness was 0.79 with combined results, but analysis of separate results by breech face and firing pin revealed low effectiveness by breech face (0.40). In the second, third, and fourth tests, effectiveness with projectiles were 0.61, 0.51, and 0.44. In addition, these tests had effectiveness with cartridge cases equivalent to 0.55, 0.43, and 0.44. Results are useful to establish routine protocols, system improvements, or comparative assessment of other electronic systems.

摘要

影响0.38特种左轮手枪自动比对、试射子弹和弹壳有效性的因素被录入到Evofinder弹道识别系统中。测试按以下方式进行:第一次测试关联相同类型的试射;第二次测试比较不同类型的弹药部件;第三次测试在更大的数据库中重复第二次测试;第四次测试让没有枪支识别经验的学生重复第三次测试。第一次测试中,系统对射弹的有效性为0.89。对于弹壳,综合结果的有效性为0.79,但按枪膛表面和撞针分别分析结果显示,枪膛表面的有效性较低(0.40)。在第二、第三和第四次测试中,射弹的有效性分别为0.61、0.51和0.44。此外,这些测试中弹壳的有效性分别为0.55、0.43和0.44。这些结果对于建立常规协议、改进系统或对其他电子系统进行比较评估很有用。

相似文献

1
Influence Factors Regarding the Effectiveness of Automated Ballistic Comparison on 0.38 Special Caliber Bullets and Cartridge Cases.关于.38特种口径子弹和弹壳自动弹道比对有效性的影响因素
J Forensic Sci. 2018 Nov;63(6):1846-1853. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.13771. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
2
Performance Evaluation of a Registered Ballistic Database Using the Evofinder® System.使用Evofinder®系统对注册弹道数据库进行性能评估。
J Forensic Sci. 2019 Sep;64(5):1335-1344. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.14054. Epub 2019 Mar 22.
3
Slight variations of breech face marks and firing pin impressions over 3070 consecutive firings evaluated by Evofinder.通过Evofinder对3070次连续射击中枪膛表面痕迹和撞针痕迹的细微变化进行评估。
Forensic Sci Int. 2018 Feb;283:85-93. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.11.035. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
4
The reference ballistic imaging database revisited.重新审视参考弹道成像数据库。
Forensic Sci Int. 2015 Mar;248:82-7. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.11.025. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
5
Determining the number of test fires needed to represent the variability present within 9mm Luger firearms.确定为体现9毫米鲁格手枪内部存在的变异性所需的试射次数。
Forensic Sci Int. 2017 Jul;276:126-133. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.04.019. Epub 2017 May 3.
6
Determining the number of test fires needed to represent the variability present within firearms of various calibers.确定所需的试射次数,以体现各种口径枪支内部存在的变异性。
Forensic Sci Int. 2018 Sep;290:56-61. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.06.010. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
7
Reproducibility of characteristic marks on fired cartridge cases from five Chinese Norinco QSZ-92 9×19mm pistols.五支中国北方工业公司QSZ-92式9×19毫米手枪发射的弹壳上特征标记的再现性
Forensic Sci Int. 2017 Sep;278:78-86. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.06.032. Epub 2017 Jul 4.
8
An evaluation of the discriminating power of an Integrated Ballistics Identification System Heritage™system with the NIST standard cartridge case (Standard Reference Material 2461).使用美国国家标准与技术研究院标准弹壳(标准参考物质2461)对综合弹道识别系统Heritage™系统的鉴别能力进行评估。
Forensic Sci Int. 2017 Nov;280:188-193. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.09.004. Epub 2017 Oct 14.
9
Investigation of Ballistic Evidence through an Automatic Image Analysis and Identification System.通过自动图像分析与识别系统对弹道证据进行调查。
J Forensic Sci. 2016 May;61(3):775-81. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.13073. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
10
Forensic comparison of fired cartridge cases: Feature-extraction methods for feature-based calculation of likelihood ratios.已发射弹壳的法医比对:基于特征计算似然比的特征提取方法。
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2022 May 27;5:100272. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2022.100272. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Interpol review of forensic firearm examination 2016-2019.国际刑警组织2016 - 2019年法医枪支检验审查
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2020 Mar 4;2:389-403. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.01.008. eCollection 2020.