University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
St. Joseph Hospital, Orange, California, USA.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Jul;56(1):153-157. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.02.014. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
Withdrawal of life support for an individual with refractory schizophrenia after attempted suicide remains controversial. Discussion regarding prognosis of mental illness and the distinction between somatic and mental illness brings out many ethical issues. This article will examine the role and weight of severe persistent mental illness in the withdrawal of life support after attempted suicide.
A 30-year-old gentleman with deafness and schizophrenia was admitted with multiple self-inflicted visceral stab wounds. He developed postoperative complications necessitating ongoing critical care. The parties involved were as follows: the patient, his parents, the critical care trauma service, the palliative and psychiatry consult services, and the ethics committee. Over the patient's hospital course, his parents struggled to reconcile his poor preinjury quality of life with his ongoing need for intensive medical intervention. The primary and consulting teams were required to integrate differing perspectives on the patient's past responsiveness to treatment and the extent to which additional efforts might advance his quality of life and limit his future suffering and suicidality. The patient's surrogate decision makers unanimously requested withdrawal of life support. An ethics committee convened to address the question of whether refractory schizophrenia can produce so poor a quality of life as to merit the withdrawal of life-sustaining measures after a suicide attempt. Consensus was achieved, and life-sustaining measures were subsequently withdrawn, allowing the patient to pass away peacefully in an inpatient hospice facility.
对于试图自杀后患有难治性精神分裂症的患者,停止生命支持的做法仍存在争议。对于精神疾病预后的讨论以及躯体疾病和精神疾病之间的区别,引发了许多伦理问题。本文将探讨严重持续性精神疾病在试图自杀后停止生命支持中的作用和重要性。
一位 30 岁的失聪男性,患有精神分裂症,因多次内脏刺伤而入院。他术后出现并发症,需要持续的重症监护。涉及的各方包括:患者、他的父母、重症监护创伤服务团队、姑息治疗和精神病学咨询服务团队以及伦理委员会。在患者的住院期间,他的父母努力调和他受伤前较差的生活质量与他对强化医疗干预的持续需求之间的矛盾。一线和会诊团队需要整合患者对既往治疗的反应性以及进一步努力是否可能提高他的生活质量并限制他未来的痛苦和自杀倾向的不同观点。患者的替代决策人一致要求停止生命支持。伦理委员会召开会议,讨论难治性精神分裂症是否会导致如此差的生活质量,以至于在试图自杀后需要停止维持生命的措施。达成了共识,随后停止了维持生命的措施,使患者在住院姑息治疗设施中平静离世。