Duong Mai-Ly T, Cothron Annaliese E, Lawson Nathaniel C, Doherty Eileen H
Dr. Duong is Assistant Professor, Center for Advanced Oral Health, Arizona School of Dentistry & Oral Health, A.T. Still University; Ms. Cothron is a biostatistician at the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio; Dr. Lawson is Assistant Professor, Division of Biomaterials, School of Dentistry, University of Alabama at Birmingham; and Ms. Doherty is Assistant Professor, Department of Comprehensive Care, School of Dental Medicine, Tufts University.
J Dent Educ. 2018 Mar;82(3):252-259. doi: 10.21815/JDE.018.024.
An Integrated National Board Dental Examination (INBDE) combining basic, behavioral, and clinical sciences will be implemented in 2020 to replace the current two-part National Board Dental Examination required for all candidates who seek to practice dentistry in the U.S. The aims of this study were to determine how U.S. dental schools are preparing for implementation of the INBDE and to assess their top administrators' attitudes about the new exam. A total of 150 deans, academic deans, and other administrators at all 64 U.S. dental schools with graduating classes in 2016 were emailed a 19-question electronic survey. The survey questions addressed the respondents' level of support, perceived benefits and challenges, and planned preparation strategies for the INBDE. The individual response rate was 59%, representing 57 of the 64 schools. Approximately 60% of the respondents either agreed or strongly agreed that they support the integrated exam, while roughly 25% either somewhat or strongly disagreed. While most respondents (72%) reported that their institutions would be prepared for the INBDE, 74% reported that the merged exam created additional strain for their institutions. Respondents reported viewing content integration and clinical applicability as benefits of the INBDE, while required curriculum changes and student preparedness and stress were seen as challenges. Most of the respondents reported their schools were currently employing strategies to prepare for the INBDE including meetings with faculty and students and changes to curricula and course content. The beginning of the fourth year and the end of the third year were the most frequently reported times when schools planned to require students to take the INBDE, although almost half of the respondents did not yet know what it would be required at their school. Several schools were reconsidering using the boards as a passing requirement. This study found that support for the INBDE was not universal, but strategies are under way to prepare students, faculty, and curricula for this new means of assessment.
一项整合基础、行为和临床科学的全国综合牙科委员会考试(INBDE)将于2020年实施,以取代目前所有在美国从事牙科执业的候选人都需要参加的两部分全国牙科委员会考试。本研究的目的是确定美国牙科学校如何为INBDE的实施做准备,并评估其高层管理人员对新考试的态度。向美国64所2016年有毕业班的牙科学校的150名院长、学术院长和其他管理人员发送了一份包含19个问题的电子调查问卷。调查问题涉及受访者的支持程度、感知到的益处和挑战,以及针对INBDE计划采取的准备策略。个人回复率为59%,代表64所学校中的57所。约60%的受访者同意或强烈同意他们支持综合考试,而约25%的受访者有点不同意或强烈不同意。虽然大多数受访者(72%)表示他们的机构将为INBDE做好准备,但74%的受访者表示合并后的考试给他们的机构带来了额外压力。受访者表示认为内容整合和临床适用性是INBDE的益处,而课程要求的改变以及学生的准备情况和压力被视为挑战。大多数受访者表示他们的学校目前正在采用一些策略为INBDE做准备,包括与教师和学生开会以及改变课程和课程内容。第四年开始和第三年结束是学校计划要求学生参加INBDE最常提到的时间,尽管几乎一半的受访者还不知道他们学校的要求是什么。几所学校正在重新考虑将这些考试作为及格要求。本研究发现,对INBDE的支持并非普遍存在,但正在采取策略让学生、教师和课程为这种新的评估方式做好准备。