Zanotti Bruno, Zingaretti Nicola, Verlicchi Angela, Alfieri Alex, Parodi Pier Camillo
Neurosurgery Clinic.
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Udine, Udine.
J Craniofac Surg. 2018 Jul;29(5):1127-1131. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004415.
When a cranioplasty implant becomes infected, standard operating procedure dictates its removal and the initiation of a long course of antibiotic therapy. However, removing such a prosthesis can have a series of adverse consequences, including delayed cognitive and motor recovery, lack of brain tissue protection, unsightly deformity, and the need for two additional surgical procedures, not to mention the additional costs involved. To maintain the advantages of cranioplasty, we opted for a conservative approach (levofloxacin and rifampicin every 24 hours for 8 weeks) in a 68-year-old woman whose custom-made porous hydroxyapatite implant, fitted following aneurysm clipping, had become infected. The tissues overlying the implant were curettaged, and the patient's clinical condition, blood markers, and infection course were continuously monitored (local monitoring was performed by single-photon emission computed tomography [SPECT]/computed tomography [CT after intravenous administration of Tc-labeled antigranulocyte antibody). Blood tests and SPECT/CT evidenced a progressive reduction in phlogosis indices and infection locus, even 1 month after antibiotic therapy was commenced, and at 2 years from cranioplasty, the same tests and clinical examination were negative. At 6-year follow-up, clinical assessment revealed nothing out of the ordinary.Hence, specific cases (hydroxyapatite prosthesis, intact dura, cranial CT and magnetic resonance imaging negative for empyema, well-vascularized scalp, antibiotic-responsive bacteria) of infected cranial implant can be treated using a conservative approach consisting of appropriate antibiotic therapy, accompanied by local debridement where necessary, and assiduous monitoring of phlogosis indices and local verification via labeled-leukocyte scintigraphy. Our report, which was compiled after a long-term follow-up period, shows that this conservative procedure appears to be a viable option in cases of infected, custom-made hydroxyapatite cranioplasty, provided that some basic rules concerning clinical and instrumental standards are adhered to, as clearly stated in our report.
当颅骨成形植入物发生感染时,标准手术流程要求将其取出并开始长期的抗生素治疗。然而,取出这种假体可能会产生一系列不良后果,包括认知和运动恢复延迟、缺乏脑组织保护、外观畸形以及需要额外进行两次手术,更不用说由此产生的额外费用了。为了保留颅骨成形术的优势,我们对一名68岁女性采取了保守治疗方法(每24小时使用左氧氟沙星和利福平,持续8周),该患者在动脉瘤夹闭术后植入的定制多孔羟基磷灰石植入物发生了感染。对植入物上方的组织进行了刮除,并持续监测患者的临床状况、血液指标和感染进程(通过单光子发射计算机断层扫描[SPECT]/计算机断层扫描[静脉注射锝标记抗粒细胞抗体后的CT]进行局部监测)。血液检查和SPECT/CT显示,即使在开始抗生素治疗1个月后,炎症指标和感染部位也在逐渐减轻,在颅骨成形术后2年,相同的检查和临床检查结果均为阴性。在6年的随访中,临床评估未发现异常。因此,对于感染的颅骨植入物的特定病例(羟基磷灰石假体、硬脑膜完整、颅骨CT和磁共振成像显示无脓胸、头皮血运良好、对抗生素敏感的细菌),可以采用保守治疗方法,包括适当的抗生素治疗,必要时进行局部清创,并通过标记白细胞闪烁显像对炎症指标进行密切监测和局部核查。我们的报告是在长期随访后编写的,表明这种保守治疗方法在感染的定制羟基磷灰石颅骨成形术病例中似乎是一种可行的选择,前提是遵守我们报告中明确规定的一些关于临床和仪器标准的基本规则。