Suppr超能文献

良性前列腺增生患者水汽热疗与多沙唑嗪、非那雄胺和联合药物治疗 3 年的疗效比较:MTOPS 试验队列数据。

Three-Year Treatment Outcomes of Water Vapor Thermal Therapy Compared to Doxazosin, Finasteride and Combination Drug Therapy in Men with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Cohort Data from the MTOPS Trial.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois; NAMSA® (TR), Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Department of Urology, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois; NAMSA® (TR), Minneapolis, Minnesota.

出版信息

J Urol. 2018 Aug;200(2):405-413. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.02.3088. Epub 2018 Mar 1.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We evaluated the long-term outcomes of treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia to compare a 1-time water vapor thermal therapy procedure with daily medical therapy in cohorts from the MTOPS (Medical Therapy of Prostatic Symptoms) study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Results in the treatment arm of a randomized, controlled trial of thermal therapy using the Rezūm® System were compared to MTOPS subjects treated with doxazosin and/or finasteride. Evaluations were restricted to medical therapy subjects, representing 1,140 of the original 3,047 (37.4%), with a prostate volume of 30 to 80 cc and an International Prostate Symptom Score of 13 or greater to include men who met key criteria of the Rezūm and MTOPS trials. Outcomes were compared during 3 years for symptom changes and clinical progression rates.

RESULTS

Thermal therapy improved symptom scores by approximately 50% throughout 36 months (p <0.0001). Symptom improvement was greater than with either drug alone but similar to that of combination drugs (p ≤0.02 and 0.73, respectively). The peak flow rate improved 4 to 5 ml per second after thermal therapy and doxazosin while thermal therapy was superior to finasteride and combination drugs for 24 and 12 months (p <0.001 and <0.01, respectively). Observed rates of clinical progression during 3 years corroborate these outcomes with approximately 5 times greater progression for any medical therapy vs a single thermal therapy procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

A single water vapor thermal therapy procedure provided effective and durable improvements in symptom scores with lower observed clinical progression rates compared to daily long-term use of pharmaceutical agents.

摘要

目的

我们评估了良性前列腺增生导致的下尿路症状治疗的长期结果,以比较一次性水蒸气热疗与 MTOPS(前列腺症状的药物治疗)研究中每日药物治疗队列的结果。

材料与方法

使用 Rezūm®系统进行的热疗随机对照试验的治疗组结果与接受多沙唑嗪和/或非那雄胺治疗的 MTOPS 受试者进行了比较。评估仅限于药物治疗组,代表了原始 3047 例中的 1140 例(37.4%),前列腺体积为 30 至 80 cc,国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)为 13 或更高,包括符合 Rezūm 和 MTOPS 试验关键标准的男性。在 3 年内比较了症状变化和临床进展率。

结果

热疗在 36 个月内使症状评分提高了约 50%(p <0.0001)。症状改善大于单独使用任何一种药物,但与联合药物相似(p ≤0.02 和 0.73,分别)。热疗和多沙唑嗪后,最大尿流率提高了 4 至 5 ml/秒,而热疗在 24 个月和 12 个月时优于非那雄胺和联合药物(p <0.001 和 <0.01,分别)。3 年内观察到的临床进展率证实了这些结果,任何药物治疗的进展率约为单次热疗的 5 倍。

结论

与长期每日使用药物治疗相比,单次水蒸气热疗可有效且持久地改善症状评分,且观察到的临床进展率较低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验