Department of Crop Sciences, College of Agricultural and Marine Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Al-Khoud 123, Oman; Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan; The UWA Institute of Agriculture and School of Agriculture and Environment, The University of Western Australia, LB 5005 Perth WA 6001, Australia; College of Food and Agricultural Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia; Department of Crop Science and Biotechnology, Dankook University, Chungnam, 330-714, South Korea.
Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2018 May;126:47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.02.020. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
Chickpea is mostly grown in rainfed environments and, consequently, its growth is affected by drought stress. This study comprised two independent experiments to investigate the physiological basis of drought tolerance in desi and kabuli chickpea genotypes. In Experiment 1, six genotypes each of desi and kabuli types were planted in soil-filled pots under natural conditions. Ten days after planting, soil moisture was maintained at 75% water holding capacity (well-watered) or 50% water holding capacity (drought stress). Drought stress significantly reduced seedling dry weight, specific leaf area (SLA), and transpiration efficiency (TE) in both chickpea types, relative to the well-watered controls, but their responses varied, with relatively fewer reductions in desi genotypes, Bakhar-2011 and Bitall-2016, and kabuli genotypes, K-70005 and Noor-2013. These four genotypes were used in experiment 2, which was similar to the first but conducted in a climate chamber and the drought was imposed at planting. Drought stress reduced stand establishment, growth, photosynthesis, water relations, α-amylase activity, sugar metabolism, proline, phenolic accumulation, nitrogen and potassium to varying degrees in the four tested genotypes. The reductions were greater in kabuli genotypes than desi genotypes. Under drought stress, desi genotypes germinated better, and had higher trehalose, total and reducing sugars, sucrose, α-amylase activity, photosynthesis, growth, and mineral concentrations than kabuli genotypes. The desi genotype Bakhar-2011 performed better under drought than the desi genotype Bitall-2016 due to better germination metabolism and accumulation of free proline, total phenolics, and trehalose, which maintained carbon assimilation and prevented oxidative damage. In conclusion, desi chickpea types tolerate drought stress better than kabuli types due to better germination metabolism and trehalose accumulation, which prevented oxidative damage, helped with efficient water use, and sustained plant growth.
鹰嘴豆主要在雨养环境中种植,因此其生长会受到干旱胁迫的影响。本研究包括两个独立的实验,以研究印度型和克伯型鹰嘴豆基因型耐旱性的生理基础。在实验 1 中,将 6 个印度型和克伯型鹰嘴豆基因型的每个品种种植在装满土壤的花盆中,在自然条件下。种植后 10 天,将土壤水分保持在 75%的持水能力(充分浇水)或 50%的持水能力(干旱胁迫)。与充分浇水的对照相比,干旱胁迫显著降低了两种鹰嘴豆类型的幼苗干重、比叶面积(SLA)和蒸腾效率(TE),但它们的反应不同,印度型基因型 Bakhar-2011 和 Bitall-2016,以及克伯型基因型 K-70005 和 Noor-2013 的减少相对较少。这四个基因型用于实验 2,实验 2与实验 1 相似,但在气候室内进行,在种植时施加干旱胁迫。干旱胁迫不同程度地降低了四个测试基因型的群体建立、生长、光合作用、水分关系、α-淀粉酶活性、糖代谢、脯氨酸、酚类物质积累、氮和钾的含量。克伯型基因型的减少比印度型基因型的减少更大。在干旱胁迫下,印度型基因型比克伯型基因型发芽更好,并且具有更高的海藻糖、总糖和还原糖、蔗糖、α-淀粉酶活性、光合作用、生长和矿物质浓度。与印度型基因型 Bitall-2016 相比,印度型基因型 Bakhar-2011 在干旱胁迫下表现更好,因为它具有更好的发芽代谢和游离脯氨酸、总酚和海藻糖的积累,这些物质维持了碳同化,防止了氧化损伤。总之,由于更好的发芽代谢和海藻糖积累,印度型鹰嘴豆类型比克伯型鹰嘴豆类型更能耐受干旱胁迫,这有助于防止氧化损伤,有助于有效利用水分,并维持植物生长。