Suppr超能文献

Shoulder mechanical demands of slow underwater exercises in the scapular plane.

作者信息

Lauer Jessy, Vilas-Boas João Paulo, Rouard Annie Hélène

机构信息

Inter-university Laboratory of Human Movement Science, University Savoie Mont Blanc, Le Bourget-du-Lac, France; Center of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport, Faculty of Sport and Porto Biomechanics Laboratory, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.

Center of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport, Faculty of Sport and Porto Biomechanics Laboratory, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.

出版信息

Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2018 Mar;53:117-123. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2018.02.014. Epub 2018 Feb 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The mechanical demands of underwater shoulder exercises have only been assessed indirectly via electromyographical measurements. Yet, this is insufficient to understand all the clinical implications. The purpose of this study was to evaluate musculoskeletal system loading during slow (30°/s) scapular plane arm elevation and lowering performed in two media (air vs water) and body positions (sitting vs supine).

METHODS

Eighteen participants' upper bodies were scanned and virtually animated within unsteady numerical fluid flow simulations to compute hydrodynamic forces. Together with weight, buoyancy and segment inertial parameters, these were fed into an inverse dynamics model to obtain net shoulder moments, power and work.

FINDINGS

Positive mechanical work done at the shoulder was 32.4% (95% CI [29.2, 35.6]) and 25.0% [22.8, 27.2] that when performing the same movement on land, supine and sitting respectively. Arm elevation was 2.5× less demanding sitting than supine (mean 0.012 (SD 0.018) vs mean 0.027 (SD 0.012) J·kg, P = 0.034). Instantaneous power was consistently positive when sitting albeit very low during elevation (0.003 W·kg) whereas, when supine, it was alternately negative for short period (1.2 s) and positive (~4.8 s), peaking at levels 3× higher (0.01 W·kg).

INTERPRETATION

Performing sitting elicited concentric muscle contractions at very low effort, which is advantageous during early rehabilitation to restore joint mobility. Exercising supine, by contrast, required rapid pre-stretch followed by concentric force production at an overall higher mechanical cost, and is therefore better suited to more advanced rehabilitation stages.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验