Kehl Sven
Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen.
Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 2018 Feb;222(1):28-30. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-124133. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
Objective of this randomized-controlled multicenter-trial was to determine whether the amniotic fluid index (AFI) or the single deepest vertical pocket (SDP) technique for estimating amniotic fluid volume is superior for predicting adverse perinatal outcome. Pregnant women at term were randomized in AFI or SDP group for assessing amniotic fluid at four unversitary hospitals. These two groups were not different with regards to primary outcome parameter (rate of postpartum admission to NICU), but concerning secondary outcome parameters: there were significantly more cases with the diagnosis oligohydramnios (9,8 vs. 2.2%), more induction of labour for oligohydrmanios (12.7 vs. 3.6%) and more abnormal CTG (32.3 vs. 26.2%) in the AFI group. None of the methods were superior to predict adverse perinatal outcome. However, the probability to diagnose oligohydramnios and to induce labour for oligohydramnios was higher when AFI technique was used.
这项随机对照多中心试验的目的是确定用于估计羊水量的羊水指数(AFI)或单一最深垂直羊水池(SDP)技术在预测围产期不良结局方面是否更具优势。足月孕妇在四家大学医院被随机分为AFI组或SDP组以评估羊水情况。两组在主要结局参数(产后入住新生儿重症监护病房的比例)方面没有差异,但在次要结局参数方面:AFI组诊断为羊水过少的病例显著更多(9.8%对2.2%),因羊水过少进行引产的更多(12.7%对3.6%),异常胎心监护也更多(32.3%对26.2%)。两种方法在预测围产期不良结局方面均无优势。然而,使用AFI技术时诊断羊水过少和因羊水过少引产的概率更高。