University of Roehampton, London, UK.
Université de Montréal, Québec, Canada.
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Mar;36(5-6):2409-2429. doi: 10.1177/0886260518758333. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
Degree of injury, as measured by the Homicide Injury Scale (HIS), was examined to advance understanding of the dynamics of sexual killing. A total of 350 nonserial, male sexual killers were included, and the different ways that the sexual element of their offenses and the act of killing were connected was accounted for by determining that cases were either directly sexual (the sexual element and killing were closely bound), or indirectly sexual (killing was not a source of sexual stimulation). The two groups, direct and indirect sexual killers, were each subjected to multiple linear regression analyses to examine the group-specific relationship between level of injury and predictor variables previously found to be associated with increased severity of attack. No differences in the mean total HIS scores between the indirect and the direct cases were found, suggesting a comparable emotional intensity between the groups. However, given that the groups differed in terms of the functional role of fatal violence, severity of attack could not be sufficiently explained as driven by anger. In line with this hypothesis, different predictors appeared to be associated with increased degree of injury sustained by victims of indirect compared with direct sexual killers. As such, situational components appear to play a role in the behavior of indirect sexual killers, whereas the behavior of direct perpetrators tends to be linked with the enactment of existing deviant fantasies. The role of anger in sexual homicide is discussed further, and overall, it is argued that irrespective of whether violence was initially driven by anger, evidence of sexual arousal to severe violence must be scrutinized within sexual homicide research as well as in psycholegal contexts.
本研究通过使用杀人伤害量表(Homicide Injury Scale,HIS)来评估伤害程度,以增进对性杀人动态的理解。共纳入 350 名非系列、男性性杀手,通过确定案件是直接性的(性元素和杀人紧密结合)还是间接性的(杀人不是性刺激的来源),来解释性犯罪和杀人行为之间的不同联系方式。对直接性和间接性性杀手两组分别进行多元线性回归分析,以检验与攻击严重程度增加相关的预测变量与损伤水平之间的特定于组的关系。间接和直接案例之间的 HIS 总分平均值没有差异,表明两组之间的情绪强度相当。然而,由于两组在致命暴力的功能角色上存在差异,因此攻击的严重程度不能仅归因于愤怒。根据这一假设,与间接性性杀手相比,不同的预测因素似乎与受害者受伤程度的增加有关。因此,情境因素似乎在间接性性杀手的行为中发挥作用,而直接犯罪者的行为往往与现有异常幻想的实施有关。进一步讨论了性杀人中的愤怒作用,总体而言,无论暴力最初是否是由愤怒驱动的,在性杀人研究以及心理法律背景下,都必须仔细审查对严重暴力的性唤起的证据。