Manfredi Paola, Taglietti Claudia
Dipartimento Scienze Cliniche Sperimentali, Università degli Studi di Brescia.
ARP Milano.
Res Psychother. 2022 Jun 30;25(2):587. doi: 10.4081/ripppo.2022.587.
This paper starts from the claim that a shared understanding of anger, in both its normal and psychopathological dimensions, is missing and that there are various therapeutic paths that seem to be less effective than those related to other pathologies. A major limitation of anger research and of its treatments lies in the lack of precise clinical diagnoses to inform therapy. For this reason, the first aim of our work is to survey critical literature in order to find useful elements to differentiate anger, starting from the evidence of negative and positive outcomes of treatments. Such evidence will then be enhanced in our proposal of interpretation and intervention, within a dynamic framework and with particular reference to Orefice's thought. The core focus is to explore the different functions that anger has for the patient and to investigate the elementary functioning of the self. Our reading of the phenomena related to anger will provide useful tools both for understanding the dynamics underlying anger and as a guide for clinical intervention.
本文开篇指出，目前缺乏对愤怒在正常及精神病理学层面的共同理解，且存在各种治疗途径，其效果似乎不如针对其他病症的治疗途径。愤怒研究及其治疗的一个主要局限在于缺乏精确的临床诊断来指导治疗。因此，我们工作的首要目标是审视批判性文献，以便从治疗的负面和正面结果证据出发，找到区分愤怒的有用要素。然后，在一个动态框架内，特别是参照奥雷菲切的思想，这些证据将在我们的解释和干预提议中得到强化。核心重点是探索愤怒对患者具有的不同功能，并研究自我的基本功能。我们对与愤怒相关现象的解读将为理解愤怒背后的动态机制提供有用工具，同时也为临床干预提供指导。
