Division of Vascular Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind.
Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind.
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Aug;68(2):560-566. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.11.088. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
Ethnic minorities (nonwhites) with critical limb ischemia (CLI) have historically performed worse compared with whites with regard to major amputation risk reduction and amputation-free survival (AFS) after peripheral vascular intervention. This post hoc analysis was completed to determine whether this precedent also extended to treatment of CLI without a suitable revascularization option with intramuscular injections of concentrated bone marrow aspirate (cBMA).
The treatment arm of the randomized, double-blind, multicenter MarrowStim PAD Kit for the Treatment of Critical Limb Ischemia in Subjects with Severe Peripheral Arterial Disease (MOBILE) trial was stratified by ethnicity and evaluated for demographics, comorbidities, and outcomes. The primary and therapeutic end point was 1-year AFS and major amputation, respectively. Noninferiority analysis was performed with the margin set at historically reported hazard ratios.
Thirty-seven minority (African American, Hispanic, other) CLI patients (9 placebo, 28 cBMA) with no suitable revascularization option were randomized to cBMA or placebo at a 3:1 ratio during the MOBILE trial. At 1-year follow-up for the treatment group, overall AFS was 80%. Of the 28 minority patients randomized to cBMA intervention, an 89% AFS rate was observed compared with 77% in whites. Specifically, 22 of 24 (92%) African Americans survived amputation free at 1-year follow-up. Noninferiority testing confirmed no difference between whites and the ethnic minority treated with cBMA with respect to major amputation reduction; however, noninferiority could not be confirmed with regard to AFS. No significant differences favoring whites treated with cBMA were noted in the secondary end points of vascular quality of life, limb pain, ankle-brachial index, toe-brachial index, transcutaneous oximetry, and 6-minute walk testing.
This post hoc analysis of the MOBILE trial demonstrates noninferiority of cBMA intervention in minorities with no-option CLI for the therapeutic end point of major amputation prevention. cBMA represents a novel treatment paradigm and should be explored for minorities with poor revascularization options who face impending amputation secondary to progressive CLI.
与白人相比,少数民族(非白人)患有严重肢体缺血(CLI),在接受外周血管介入治疗后,其主要截肢风险降低和无截肢生存率(AFS)方面表现更差。本研究进行了一项事后分析,以确定这一先例是否也适用于没有合适血管重建选择的 CLI 患者,即用肌肉内注射浓缩骨髓抽吸物(cBMA)进行治疗。
随机、双盲、多中心 MarrowStim PAD 治疗严重外周动脉疾病(MOBILE)试验的治疗组按种族进行分层,并评估了患者的人口统计学、合并症和结局。主要和治疗终点分别为 1 年 AFS 和主要截肢。非劣效性分析采用历史报告的危险比作为边界。
在 MOBILE 试验中,37 例少数民族(非裔美国人、西班牙裔、其他)CLI 患者(9 例安慰剂,28 例 cBMA)无合适血管重建选择,按 3:1 的比例随机分为 cBMA 或安慰剂组。在治疗组的 1 年随访中,整体 AFS 为 80%。在随机接受 cBMA 干预的 28 例少数民族患者中,观察到 89%的 AFS 率,而白人患者为 77%。具体来说,24 例非裔美国人中,有 22 例(92%)在 1 年随访时免于截肢。非劣效性检验证实,cBMA 治疗的白人患者与少数民族患者在减少主要截肢方面无差异;然而,在 AFS 方面无法确认非劣效性。在次要终点方面,如血管生活质量、肢体疼痛、踝肱指数、趾肱指数、经皮血氧测定和 6 分钟步行测试,未发现接受 cBMA 治疗的白人有明显优势。
MOBILE 试验的这项事后分析表明,对于没有选择的 CLI 少数民族患者,cBMA 干预在治疗终点即预防主要截肢方面具有非劣效性。cBMA 代表了一种新的治疗模式,应该在面临 CLI 进展导致即将截肢的少数民族患者中进行探索,这些患者的血管重建选择较差。