Contemporary outcomes of limb-salvage procedures using Vascular Quality Initiative-Medicare-linked data: Racial and ethnic disparities persist.

BACKGROUND

Several reports have shown that ethnic and racial minority patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) are more likely to undergo major amputation. Whether this disparity is driven by limited access to care, statistical discrimination, or biologic factors has remained a matter of debate. We studied the effects of race and ethnicity on the short- and long-term outcomes of limb-salvage procedures among patients with new-onset CLTI.

METHODS

We identified all patients who had undergone first time (open or endovascular) revascularization for CLTI between January 2010 and December 2016 in the Vascular Quality Initiative-Medicare-linked database. These patients were divided into two groups: non-Hispanic White (NHW) and racial and ethnic minority (REM). The early end points included length of stay and operative mortality. The 2-year outcomes included major amputation, freedom from subsequent revascularization, number of limb salvage reinterventions, and all-cause mortality. Subanalyses comparing NHW and Hispanic patients and NHW and Black patients were also performed.

RESULTS

Of 16,249 patients presenting with CLTI, 73.9% were NHW. The REM patients were younger (mean age, 69.9 ± 11.3 years vs 74.2 ± 10.5 years; P < .001) and more likely to be women (45.9% vs 37.7%; P < .001). Other baseline differences included a higher rate of smoking history, coronary artery disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and chronic kidney disease for the NHW group. In contrast, the REM patients were more likely to have diabetes and hypertension and were more likely to present with tissue loss (78% vs 76.6%; P = .04). The preoperative ankle brachial index and procedure type (endovascular vs open) were similar between the two groups. On multivariable analysis, the NHW group had had a 13% increase in the length of stay and a 25% decrease in operative mortality. Of the 2-year outcomes, the limb salvage estimate was 86% for the NHW group and 77.1% for the REM group (P < .001). A comparison between the two groups showed similar rates of freedom from subsequent revascularization (67.9% vs 67.1%; P =.2). The REM patients had had higher rates of overall survival (70.3% vs 68.4%; P = .01) compared with their NHW counterparts. The patients in the REM group were also more likely to have undergone more than two limb salvage reinterventions during follow-up (14.2% vs 8.6%; P < .001). After adjusting for potential confounders, the REM patients had significantly greater odds of major amputation at 2 years (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.49; 95% confidence interval, 1.36-1.63; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The results from the present Vascular Quality Initiative-Medicare-matched study have shown that REM patients continue to face a higher major amputation risk despite equivalent attempts at limb salvage. Further studies to identify the risk factors and evaluate intervention strategies that might be more effective in preventing amputation in this particular population are warranted.