Suppr超能文献

使用i-STAT和Hemochron活化凝血时间对肝素抗凝作用的评估。

Assessment of Heparin Anticoagulation Measured Using i-STAT and Hemochron Activated Clotting Time.

作者信息

Maslow Andrew, Chambers Alison, Cheves Tracey, Sweeney Joseph

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Rhode Island Hospital, Needham, MA.

Department of Biostatistics, Rhode Island Hospital, Needham, MA.

出版信息

J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2018 Aug;32(4):1603-1608. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2018.01.027. Epub 2018 Jan 31.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Adequate anticoagulation, measured using activated clotting time (ACT), is important during vascular and cardiac surgeries. Unfractionated heparin is the most common anticoagulant used. The purpose of this analysis was to compare the i-STAT ACT (iACT) to the Hemochron ACT (hACT), both of which were then compared to anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) assay, a representation of heparin level and activity.

DESIGN

Prospective study.

SETTING

Tertiary care cardiovascular center.

PARTICIPANTS

Eleven consecutive elective adult cardiac surgical patients.

INTERVENTIONS

Prior to cardiopulmonary bypass, ACTs were measured using i-STAT and Hemochron technologies and compared to each other and to anti-Xa assay prior to and during a cumulative administration of heparin. Data were compared using bias analyses.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Heparin (300 U/kg) was administered in quarterly doses. Coagulation labs were collected prior to and 3 minutes after each quarterly dose of heparin. The baseline ACTs for i-STAT and Hemochron were 147 and 142 seconds, respectively. A significant association was found between iACT and hACT (p = 0.002). The iACT measurements underestimated hACT at ACT levels >180 seconds or anti-Xa levels >0.75 U/mL. No significant difference was found between ACT data at anti-Xa levels <0.5 U/mL.

CONCLUSION

There was a good association between the iACT and hACT; however, the 2 tests are not equivalent. Overall, the iACT underestimated the hACT. Agreement between the ACT technologies was good at lower ACTs and anti-Xa levels, but declined with an anti-Xa >0.75 U/mL.

摘要

目的

在血管和心脏手术期间,使用活化凝血时间(ACT)来衡量充分的抗凝作用很重要。普通肝素是最常用的抗凝剂。本分析的目的是比较i-STAT ACT(iACT)和Hemochron ACT(hACT),并将两者与抗Xa因子(抗Xa)测定进行比较,抗Xa因子测定代表肝素水平和活性。

设计

前瞻性研究。

地点

三级心血管护理中心。

参与者

连续11例择期成年心脏手术患者。

干预措施

在体外循环前,使用i-STAT和Hemochron技术测量ACT,并在肝素累积给药之前和期间相互比较,并与抗Xa测定进行比较。使用偏倚分析比较数据。

测量指标和主要结果

按季度剂量给予肝素(300 U/kg)。在每次季度剂量肝素给药前和给药后3分钟收集凝血实验室数据。i-STAT和Hemochron的基线ACT分别为147秒和142秒。iACT和hACT之间存在显著相关性(p = 0.002)。当ACT水平>180秒或抗Xa水平>0.75 U/mL时,iACT测量值低估了hACT。在抗Xa水平<0.5 U/mL时,ACT数据之间未发现显著差异。

结论

iACT和hACT之间存在良好的相关性;然而,这两种测试并不等效。总体而言,iACT低估了hACT。在较低的ACT和抗Xa水平时,ACT技术之间的一致性良好,但当抗Xa>0.75 U/mL时一致性下降。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验