• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者及其家属作为研究团队的合作伙伴,什么样的参与才算有意义?

What constitutes meaningful engagement for patients and families as partners on research teams?

机构信息

1 Director, Research and Knowledge Translation, Professional Practice Office, Providence Health Care, Canada.

2 Patient Research Partner, Providence Health Care, Canada.

出版信息

J Health Serv Res Policy. 2018 Jul;23(3):158-167. doi: 10.1177/1355819618762960. Epub 2018 Mar 4.

DOI:10.1177/1355819618762960
PMID:29504424
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6041763/
Abstract

Objective There is growing emphasis on health care organizations to ensure that lay people are meaningfully engaged as partners on research teams. Our aim was to explore the perspectives of patients, family members and informal caregivers who have been involved on health care research teams in Canada and elicit their recommendations for meaningful engagement. Methods We conducted a qualitative study guided by thematic analysis of transcripts of focus groups and interviews of 19 experienced patient research partners in Canada. Results We identified four main themes: research environment, expectations, support and value, which highlight participants' combined perspectives on important factors to ensure their engagement in research is meaningful. Conclusions Our findings add to the evolving evidence base on the perspectives of lay people involved in health care research and their recommendations for research leaders on meaningful engagement. Our study suggests that research leaders should provide a welcoming research environment, outline appropriate expectations for patient research partners on research teams, support patient research partners' engagement in projects and recognize the value patient research partners bring to health research.

摘要

目的

越来越强调医疗机构要确保将非专业人士作为研究团队的合作伙伴,让他们有意义地参与其中。我们的目的是探讨在加拿大参与医疗保健研究团队的患者、家属和非正式照顾者的观点,并征求他们对有意义参与的建议。

方法

我们进行了一项定性研究,对加拿大 19 名经验丰富的患者研究伙伴的焦点小组和访谈记录进行了主题分析。

结果

我们确定了四个主要主题

研究环境、期望、支持和价值,这些主题突出了参与者对确保他们参与研究有意义的重要因素的综合观点。

结论

我们的研究结果增加了关于参与医疗保健研究的非专业人士的观点以及研究领导者关于有意义参与的建议的不断发展的证据基础。我们的研究表明,研究领导者应该提供一个受欢迎的研究环境,为研究团队中的患者研究伙伴概述适当的期望,支持患者研究伙伴参与项目,并认识到患者研究伙伴为健康研究带来的价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e30/6041763/0ec68e0c446d/10.1177_1355819618762960-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e30/6041763/0ec68e0c446d/10.1177_1355819618762960-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e30/6041763/0ec68e0c446d/10.1177_1355819618762960-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
What constitutes meaningful engagement for patients and families as partners on research teams?患者及其家属作为研究团队的合作伙伴,什么样的参与才算有意义?
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2018 Jul;23(3):158-167. doi: 10.1177/1355819618762960. Epub 2018 Mar 4.
2
The dynamic nature of patient engagement within a Canadian patient-oriented kidney health research network: Perspectives of researchers and patient partners.加拿大以患者为导向的肾脏健康研究网络中患者参与的动态性质:研究人员和患者伙伴的观点。
Health Expect. 2023 Apr;26(2):905-918. doi: 10.1111/hex.13716. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
3
'Adding another spinning plate to an already busy life Benefits and risks in patient partner-researcher relationships: a qualitative study of patient partners' experiences in a Canadian health research setting.在已然忙碌的生活中增添另一个旋转的盘子:患者-伙伴-研究者关系中的益处与风险:对加拿大健康研究环境下患者伙伴经历的定性研究
BMJ Open. 2018 Aug 17;8(8):e022154. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022154.
4
Patient and caregiver perspectives on virtual care: a patient-oriented qualitative study.患者和照护者对虚拟医疗的看法:一项以患者为导向的定性研究。
CMAJ Open. 2022 Mar 1;10(1):E165-E172. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20210065. Print 2022 Jan-Mar.
5
What motivates patients and caregivers to engage in health research and how engagement affects their lives: Qualitative survey findings.激励患者和照护者参与健康研究的因素以及参与如何影响他们的生活:定性调查结果。
Health Expect. 2020 Apr;23(2):328-336. doi: 10.1111/hex.12979. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
6
'Safety is about partnership': Safety through the lens of patients and caregivers.“安全关乎合作”:从患者和护理人员的视角看安全。
Health Expect. 2024 Feb;27(1):e13939. doi: 10.1111/hex.13939.
7
Patient, family member and caregiver engagement in shaping policy for primary health care teams in three Canadian Provinces.患者、家庭成员和照护者参与制定加拿大三个省份基层医疗团队政策。
Health Expect. 2022 Aug;25(4):1730-1740. doi: 10.1111/hex.13516. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
8
Development and pre-testing of the Patient Engagement In Research Scale (PEIRS) to assess the quality of engagement from a patient perspective.患者参与研究量表(PEIRS)的制定和预测试,以从患者角度评估参与的质量。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 1;13(11):e0206588. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206588. eCollection 2018.
9
Patient and researcher experiences of patient engagement in primary care health care research: A participatory qualitative study.患者和研究人员对初级保健医疗研究中患者参与的体验:一项参与式定性研究。
Health Expect. 2022 Oct;25(5):2365-2376. doi: 10.1111/hex.13542. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
10
Researcher and partner perspectives on the relationship between engagement in research and three uses of patient-centered comparative clinical effectiveness research study findings.研究者及合作伙伴对参与研究与以患者为中心的比较临床疗效研究结果的三种用途之间关系的看法。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Oct 14;10(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00632-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving the reporting on health equity in observational research (STROBE-Equity): extension checklist and elaboration.改进观察性研究中健康公平性的报告(STROBE-公平性):扩展清单及阐述
BMJ. 2025 Sep 3;390:e083882. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-083882.
2
Seven Actions Towards Advancing Patient Authorship and Collaboration in Peer-Reviewed Publications.推进患者在同行评审出版物中的作者身份和合作的七项行动。
Patient. 2025 Jul 2. doi: 10.1007/s40271-025-00750-w.
3
Patient engagement strategies in digital health interventions for cancer survivors: A scoping review.

本文引用的文献

1
GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research.GRIPP2报告清单:用于改善患者和公众参与研究报告的工具。
Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Aug 2;3:13. doi: 10.1186/s40900-017-0062-2. eCollection 2017.
2
The patient voice in research-evolution of a role.患者在研究中的声音——角色的演变
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Feb 22;2:6. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0020-4. eCollection 2016.
3
An empirically based conceptual framework for fostering meaningful patient engagement in research.基于实证的概念框架,以促进患者有意义地参与研究。
癌症幸存者数字健康干预中的患者参与策略:一项范围综述
PLOS Digit Health. 2025 May 30;4(5):e0000871. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000871. eCollection 2025 May.
4
Improved Mental Health Support for Patients With Self-Harm Injuries in the Emergency Department: Design and Development of a Future Patient Care Pathway.急诊科对自残伤患者心理健康支持的改善:未来患者护理路径的设计与开发
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2025 Jun;34(3):e70067. doi: 10.1111/inm.70067.
5
Evaluation of the Patient Innovation Partner Role: Perceived Benefits, Structures, Supports, and Recommendations for Lived Experience Engagement in Healthcare Innovation Teams.患者创新伙伴角色评估:医疗创新团队中参与真实体验的感知益处、结构、支持及建议
Health Expect. 2025 Apr;28(2):e70194. doi: 10.1111/hex.70194.
6
Mobilizing the Power of Lived/Living Experiences to Improve Health Outcomes for all.调动生活经历的力量,改善所有人的健康状况。
Health Expect. 2025 Apr;28(2):e70212. doi: 10.1111/hex.70212.
7
Development, implementation, and scalability of the Family Engagement in Research Course: a novel online course for family partners and researchers in neurodevelopmental disability and child health.研究中的家庭参与课程的开发、实施与可扩展性:面向神经发育障碍和儿童健康领域家庭伙伴及研究人员的新型在线课程
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Aug 5;10(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00615-w.
8
Implementing the patient partnership approach to quality improvement of care and services: A multiple case study protocol.实施患者伙伴关系方法以改善医疗服务质量:一项多案例研究方案。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 22;19(7):e0307160. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307160. eCollection 2024.
9
Wonderings to research questions: Engaging patients in long COVID research prioritization within a learning health system.对研究问题的思考:在学习型健康系统中让患者参与长新冠研究的优先级确定
Learn Health Syst. 2024 Feb 28;8(Suppl 1):e10410. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10410. eCollection 2024 Jun.
10
COCCOS study: Developing a transition program for adolescents with chronic conditions using Experience-Based Co-Design. A study protocol.COCCOS 研究:使用基于经验的共同设计为慢性病青少年开发过渡计划。研究方案。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 5;19(4):e0298571. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298571. eCollection 2024.
Health Expect. 2018 Feb;21(1):396-406. doi: 10.1111/hex.12635. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
4
Moving towards a more inclusive patient and public involvement in health research paradigm: the incorporation of a trauma-informed intersectional analysis.迈向更具包容性的患者和公众参与健康研究范式:纳入创伤知情的交叉性分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Aug 7;17(1):539. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2463-1.
5
Evaluating patient and public involvement in health research: from theoretical model to practical workshop.评估患者和公众参与健康研究:从理论模型到实践研讨会。
Health Expect. 2017 Oct;20(5):826-835. doi: 10.1111/hex.12486. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
6
"How can anybody be representative for those kind of people?" Forms of patient representation in health research, and why it is always contestable.在健康研究中,如何让任何人能够代表那类人群?患者代表性的形式,以及为什么这始终是有争议的。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Jun;183:62-69. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.04.049. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
7
Advancing Telephone Focus Groups Method Through the Use of Webinar: Methodological Reflections on Evaluating Ontario, Canada's Healthy Babies Healthy Children Program.通过网络研讨会推进电话焦点小组方法:对加拿大安大略省健康婴儿健康儿童计划评估的方法学思考
Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2015 Oct 5;2:2333393615607840. doi: 10.1177/2333393615607840. eCollection 2015 Jan-Dec.
8
Emerging Guidelines for Patient Engagement in Research.患者参与研究的新兴指南。
Value Health. 2017 Mar;20(3):481-486. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.10.003. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
9
Expanding patient engagement in quality improvement and health system redesign: Three Canadian case studies.扩大患者在质量改进和卫生系统重新设计中的参与度:三个加拿大案例研究。
Healthc Manage Forum. 2016 Sep;29(5):176-82. doi: 10.1177/0840470416645601.
10
How and why should we engage parents as co-researchers in health research? A scoping review of current practices.我们应当如何以及为何让家长作为共同研究者参与健康研究?对当前实践做法的范围综述。
Health Expect. 2017 Aug;20(4):543-554. doi: 10.1111/hex.12490. Epub 2016 Aug 12.