Lee Yen-Han, Chiang Timothy, Liu Ching-Ti
Indiana University School of Public Health-Bloomington , Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine , Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2018 Feb 12;31(1):41-51. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-01-2017-0001.
Purpose China launched a comprehensive health reform in 2009 to improve healthcare quality. Because preventive care utilization in China has not been frequently discussed, the purpose of this paper is to focus on the association between education level and preventive care before and after the initiation of the reform. Education has been referred to as the best health outcome indicator and China's educational reform has been progressive, such as the health reform. Design/methodology/approach The authors analyzed data from four China Health and Nutrition Surveys (CHNS): 2004 ( n=9,617); 2006 ( n=9,527); 2009 ( n=9,873); and 2011 ( n=9,430). Variables were selected based on Andersen's healthcare utilization model (predisposing, enabling and need factors). Multivariable logistic regression models, odds ratios (ORs) and 95 percent confidence intervals (95 percent CI) were conducted and reported. Findings In the adjusted multivariable logistic regression models, the authors found that general education was associated ( p<0.05) with access to preventive care in 2004, 2009 and 2011, but not in 2006. Individuals with higher education had higher ORs for utilizing preventive care, compared with lower education (primary school education or none). Practical implications Policy implications include providing educational protocols regarding preventive care's significance to residents educated at lower level schools, especially younger individuals. Originality/value To the authors' knowledge, this is the first comparative assessment on education level and preventive care utilization before and after the implementation of the Chinese health reform.
目的 中国于2009年启动了全面的医疗改革,以提高医疗质量。由于中国预防性医疗服务的利用情况尚未得到频繁讨论,本文旨在关注改革启动前后教育水平与预防性医疗服务之间的关联。教育被视为最佳的健康结果指标,并且中国的教育改革一直在推进,医疗改革亦是如此。
设计/方法/途径 作者分析了四次中国健康与营养调查(CHNS)的数据:2004年(n = 9617);2006年(n = 9527);2009年(n = 9873);以及2011年(n = 9430)。变量是根据安德森医疗服务利用模型( predisposing、 enabling和需求因素)选择的。进行并报告了多变量逻辑回归模型、比值比(ORs)和95%置信区间(95% CI)。
结果 在调整后的多变量逻辑回归模型中,作者发现普通教育在2004年、2009年和2011年与获得预防性医疗服务相关(p < 0.05),但在2006年不相关。与低教育水平(小学教育或无教育)相比,受过高等教育的个体利用预防性医疗服务的ORs更高。
实际意义 政策意义包括为低水平学校教育的居民,尤其是年轻人,提供有关预防性医疗服务重要性的教育方案。
原创性/价值 据作者所知,这是对中国医疗改革实施前后教育水平与预防性医疗服务利用情况的首次比较评估。