Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Hempstead, NY.
Northwell Health, South Oaks Hospital, Amityville, NY.
Am J Ther. 2018 Mar/Apr;25(2):e218-e223. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000000715.
Clozapine is widely prescribed for treatment-refractory schizophrenia, but its use is limited by many potentially life-threatening adverse effects. The risk of rechallenge after these complications has never been comprehensively assessed in controlled studies. Thus, clinical guidelines must rely on the published case reports. The number of such reports is likely to increase over time, and updated analyses of larger samples are needed, as they may lead to changes in clinical guidelines.
How safe is the clozapine rechallenge after life-threatening adverse effects?
The published case reports of clozapine rechallenge were identified in a MEDLINE search. We added 121 cases reported from 2012 through 2017 to the 138 cases reported from 1972 through 2011 analyzed by us in a previous publication. The 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the successful rechallenge rate were calculated for each adverse effect with at least 5 published case reports. The rechallenge was considered a valid clinical option when the lower end of the CI range was at least 50%.
A successful outcome was documented in 128/203 patients rechallenged after neutropenia (63.0%, CI, 56.0%-69.6%), 3/17 after agranulocytosis (17.7%, CI, 4.7%-44.2%), 11/17 after myocarditis (64.7%, CI, 38.6%-84.7%), and 7/7 after neuroleptic malignant syndrome (100%, CI, 56.1%-100%). Among the 15 patients with other clozapine-induced adverse effects, the rechallenge was successful in those with eosinophilia, cardiac complications other than myocarditis (QTc prolongation, pericarditis, cardiomyopathy, and atrial flutter), and gastrointestinal hypomotility. The rechallenge failed in patients who had developed pancreatitis or renal insufficiency.
Clozapine rechallenge is a reasonable clinical option after return to baseline for patients who had developed neutropenia and neuroleptic malignant syndrome, but not after agranulocytosis or myocarditis. Data are insufficient to formulate rechallenge guidelines for any other clozapine-related adverse effects.
氯氮平被广泛用于治疗难治性精神分裂症,但由于其存在许多潜在的危及生命的不良反应,其应用受到限制。在对照研究中,尚未全面评估这些并发症后再次用药的风险。因此,临床指南必须依赖已发表的病例报告。随着时间的推移,此类报告的数量可能会增加,并且需要对更大样本进行更新分析,因为这可能导致临床指南的改变。
氯氮平在发生危及生命的不良反应后再次使用的安全性如何?
通过 MEDLINE 检索确定了氯氮平再次用药的已发表病例报告。我们将 2012 年至 2017 年期间报告的 121 例病例与我们之前发表的 1972 年至 2011 年期间报告的 138 例病例相加。对于至少有 5 篇已发表病例报告的每种不良反应,计算了成功再次用药率的 95%置信区间(CI)。当 CI 范围的下限至少为 50%时,再次用药被认为是一种有效的临床选择。
中性粒细胞减少症(中性粒细胞减少)后再次用药的 128/203 例患者(63.0%,CI,56.0%-69.6%)、粒细胞缺乏症(粒细胞缺乏)后再次用药的 3/17 例患者(17.7%,CI,4.7%-44.2%)、心肌炎(心肌炎)后再次用药的 11/17 例患者(64.7%,CI,38.6%-84.7%)和神经阻滞剂恶性综合征(神经阻滞剂恶性综合征)后再次用药的 7/7 例患者(100%,CI,56.1%-100%)均取得了良好的效果。在其他 15 例氯氮平引起的不良反应患者中,再次用药成功的患者有嗜酸粒细胞增多症、除心肌炎以外的心脏并发症(QTc 延长、心包炎、心肌病和心房颤动)和胃肠道动力低下。胰腺炎或肾功能不全患者的再次用药失败。
中性粒细胞减少和神经阻滞剂恶性综合征患者恢复至基线后,氯氮平再次用药是合理的临床选择,但粒细胞缺乏症或心肌炎患者并非如此。对于任何其他与氯氮平相关的不良反应,目前尚无足够的数据制定再次用药指南。