Suppr超能文献

左冠状动脉系统与右冠状动脉系统旁路移植术后桥血管通畅率的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Comparison of graft patency following coronary artery bypass grafting in the left versus the right coronary artery systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK.

Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Center for Health Technology and Services Research, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.

出版信息

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Aug 1;54(2):221-228. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy060.

Abstract

Although coronary artery bypass grafting has been the standard of care for patients with complex coronary artery disease for over 50 years, the evolution of graft patency over time in the left versus the right coronary systems remains poorly documented. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to characterize the evolution of graft patency over time comparing the left (excluding left anterior descending artery) and right coronary systems, with an emphasis on the comparison of venous versus arterial grafts and symptomatic versus asymptomatic patients. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and MEDLINE from inception to August 2016. We also searched clinical trials registers and reference lists of relevant studies. We included randomized clinical trials and observational studies comparing graft patency in the left versus the right coronary systems. Our outcome was graft patency defined as a binary variable according to whether grafts were reported as patent or failed at the time of angiogram. Data collection and analysis were performed according to the methodological recommendations of the Cochrane Collaboration. From a total 2275 papers, 52 studies were included in the qualitative analysis and 48 studies (including 36 006 grafts) in the meta-analysis. There was a 3.3% significant difference between the left-sided and right-sided graft patency, and the difference appeared to increase over time. Furthermore, patency of arterial grafts was higher in the left coronary system, while venous grafts performed similarly irrespective of the coronary circulation. Symptom recurrence also seemed related to a higher failure rate in the right coronary circulation. However, the high degree of heterogeneity precluded drawing definite conclusions. This meta-analysis suggested that graft patency might be better for left-sided vessels and that this difference might be driven by the better performance of arterial grafts in the left coronary system. However, evidence currently available is limited, and further research is warranted to understand whether certain grafts achieve better patency in the right versus the left coronary circulations.

摘要

虽然冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)作为治疗复杂冠状动脉疾病的标准方案已经有超过 50 年的历史,但是关于左冠状动脉和右冠状动脉系统中桥血管通畅率随时间的演变情况仍然缺乏详细的文献记载。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在描述左冠状动脉(不包括左前降支)和右冠状动脉系统中桥血管通畅率随时间的演变情况,并特别关注静脉桥和动脉桥以及有症状和无症状患者之间的比较。我们检索了 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)和 MEDLINE 数据库,检索时间截至 2016 年 8 月。我们还检索了临床试验注册数据库和相关研究的参考文献列表。我们纳入了比较左冠状动脉和右冠状动脉系统中桥血管通畅率的随机临床试验和观察性研究。我们的主要结局为根据血管造影时桥血管是否报告为通畅或闭塞而定义的桥血管通畅率,为二分类变量。数据收集和分析均根据 Cochrane 协作组的方法学建议进行。从最初检索到的 2275 篇文献中,有 52 项研究纳入定性分析,48 项研究(包含 36006 个桥血管)纳入荟萃分析。左冠状动脉和右冠状动脉的桥血管通畅率之间存在 3.3%的显著差异,而且这种差异似乎随时间推移而增加。此外,左冠状动脉系统中动脉桥的通畅率较高,而静脉桥在左、右冠状动脉循环中表现相似。症状复发似乎也与右冠状动脉循环中更高的闭塞率有关。但是,由于存在高度异质性,我们无法得出明确的结论。本荟萃分析表明,左冠状动脉系统中的桥血管通畅率可能更好,这种差异可能是由于左冠状动脉系统中动脉桥的性能更好所致。然而,目前的证据有限,需要进一步的研究来明确某些桥血管在右冠状动脉循环中是否比在左冠状动脉循环中具有更好的通畅率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验