Department of Cardiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Netherlands Heart Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Department of Cardiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Apr 15;257:67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.12.038.
Current guidelines on oral anticoagulation (OAC) in adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD) and atrial arrhythmias (AA) consist of heterogeneous and divergent recommendations with limited level of evidence, possibly leading to diverse OAC management and different outcomes. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate real-world implementation and outcome of three guidelines on OAC management in ACHD patients with AA.
The ESC GUCH 2010, PACES/HRS 2014 and ESC atrial fibrillation (AF) 2016 guidelines were assessed for implementation. ACHD patients with recurrent or sustained non-valvular AA from 5 tertiary centers were identified using a national ACHD registry. After two years of prospective follow-up, thromboembolism, major bleeding and death were assessed.
In total, 225 adults (mean age 54±15years, 55% male) with various defects (simple 43%; moderate 37%; complex 20%) and AA were included. Following the most strict indication (OAC is recommended in all three guidelines), one should treat a mere 37% of ACHD patients with AA, whereas following the least strict indication (OAC is recommended in any one of the three guidelines), one should treat 98% of patients. The various guidelines were implemented in 54-80% of patients. From all recommendations, Fontan circulation, CHA2DS2-VASc≥1 and AF were independently associated with OAC prescription. Superiority of any guideline in identifying outcome (n=15) could not be demonstrated.
The implementation of current guidelines on OAC management in ACHD patients with AA is low, probably due to substantial heterogeneity among guidelines. OAC prescription in daily practice was most consistent in patients with AF and CHA2DS2-VASc≥1 or Fontan circulation.
目前关于先天性心脏病(ACHD)合并心房颤动(AF)患者的口服抗凝药物(OAC)治疗的指南包括异质性和分歧性建议,证据水平有限,可能导致 OAC 管理多样化,并导致不同的结局。因此,我们旨在评估 3 项关于 ACHD 合并 AF 患者 OAC 管理指南的真实世界实施情况和结局。
评估 ESC GUCH 2010、PACES/HRS 2014 和 ESC AF 2016 指南的实施情况。使用国家 ACHD 登记处,从 5 个三级中心识别出患有复发性或持续性非瓣膜性 AF 的 ACHD 患者。在 2 年的前瞻性随访后,评估血栓栓塞、大出血和死亡事件。
共纳入 225 名年龄 54±15 岁(55%为男性)、患有各种缺陷(单纯性缺陷 43%;中度缺陷 37%;复杂性缺陷 20%)和 AF 的成年人。根据最严格的适应证(在所有 3 项指南中均推荐 OAC),仅应治疗 37%的 ACHD 合并 AF 患者,而根据最宽松的适应证(在 3 项指南中的任何一项中均推荐 OAC),应治疗 98%的患者。各种指南在患者中的实施率为 54%-80%。从所有推荐中,Fontan 循环、CHA2DS2-VASc≥1 和 AF 与 OAC 处方独立相关。不能证明任何指南在确定结局(n=15)方面具有优越性。
目前关于 ACHD 合并 AF 患者 OAC 管理指南的实施率较低,可能是由于指南之间存在较大的异质性。在 AF 合并 CHA2DS2-VASc≥1 或 Fontan 循环的患者中,OAC 处方在日常实践中最一致。