• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会变革、文化演变与人类发展。

Social change, cultural evolution, and human development.

作者信息

Greenfield Patricia M

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, USA.

出版信息

Curr Opin Psychol. 2016 Apr;8:84-92. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.10.012. Epub 2015 Oct 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.10.012
PMID:29506809
Abstract

Social change has accelerated globally. Greenfield's interdisciplinary and multilevel theory of social change and human development provides a unified framework for exploring implications of these changes for cultural values, learning environments/socialization processes, and human development/behavior. Data from societies where social change has occurred in place (US, China, and Mexico) and a community where it has occurred through international migration (Mexican immigrants in the US) elucidate these implications. Globally dominant sociodemographic trends are: rural to urban, agriculture to commerce, isolation to interconnectedness, less to more education, less to more technology, lesser to greater wealth, and larger to smaller families/households. These trends lead to both cultural losses (e.g., interdependence/collectivism, respect, tradition, contextualized thinking) and cultural gains (e.g., independence/individualism, equality, innovation, abstraction).

摘要

全球范围内社会变革加速。格林菲尔德关于社会变革与人类发展的跨学科多层次理论,为探究这些变革对文化价值观、学习环境/社会化进程以及人类发展/行为的影响提供了一个统一框架。来自社会变革在当地发生的社会(美国、中国和墨西哥)以及通过国际移民发生社会变革的社区(美国的墨西哥移民)的数据阐明了这些影响。全球占主导地位的社会人口趋势包括:从农村到城市、从农业到商业、从孤立到相互联系、教育程度从低到高、技术从少到多、财富从少到多以及家庭/住户规模从大到小。这些趋势既导致了文化损失(例如,相互依存/集体主义、尊重、传统、情境化思维),也带来了文化收获(例如,独立/个人主义、平等、创新、抽象思维)。

相似文献

1
Social change, cultural evolution, and human development.社会变革、文化演变与人类发展。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2016 Apr;8:84-92. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.10.012. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
2
Cultural evolution over the last 40 years in China: using the Google Ngram Viewer to study implications of social and political change for cultural values.中国过去40年的文化演变:利用谷歌Ngram Viewer研究社会和政治变革对文化价值观的影响
Int J Psychol. 2015 Feb;50(1):47-55. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12125. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
3
Linking social change and developmental change: shifting pathways of human development.连接社会变革与发展变革:人类发展途径的转变
Dev Psychol. 2009 Mar;45(2):401-18. doi: 10.1037/a0014726.
4
Identity and sociocultural change: Comparing young indigenous people in Chiapas who have different sociodemographic trajectories.身份认同与社会文化变迁:比较恰帕斯州具有不同社会人口轨迹的年轻原住民
Int J Psychol. 2018 Aug;53(4):295-303. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12381. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
5
The decline of cooperation, the rise of competition: developmental effects of long-term social change in Mexico.合作的衰落,竞争的兴起:墨西哥长期社会变革的发展影响。
Int J Psychol. 2015 Feb;50(1):6-11. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12120. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
6
Exploring the implications of social change for human development: perspectives, issues and future directions.探索社会变革对人类发展的影响:观点、问题及未来方向。
Int J Psychol. 2015 Feb;50(1):56-9. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12128. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
7
Special section: Social change, cultural evolution and human development.特别板块:社会变革、文化演变与人类发展
Int J Psychol. 2015 Feb;50(1):4-5. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12121.
8
Social structure, infectious diseases, disasters, secularism, and cultural change in America.美国的社会结构、传染病、灾害、世俗主义和文化变迁。
Psychol Sci. 2015 Mar;26(3):311-24. doi: 10.1177/0956797614563765. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
9
The relationship between relational models and individualism and collectivism: evidence from culturally diverse work groups.关系型模型与个人主义和集体主义的关系:来自文化多元化工作群体的证据。
Int J Psychol. 2009 Apr;44(2):120-8. doi: 10.1080/00207590701545684.
10
Not all cultural values are created equal: Cultural change in China reexamined through Google books.并非所有文化价值观都是平等的:通过谷歌图书重新审视中国的文化变迁
Int J Psychol. 2019 Feb;54(1):144-154. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12436. Epub 2017 Jun 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding prosocial behaviour: perspectives from different cultures and generations.理解亲社会行为:来自不同文化和世代的视角。
Aust J Psychol. 2025 May 26;77(1):2507634. doi: 10.1080/00049530.2025.2507634. eCollection 2025.
2
Aggression and Adjustment Among Chinese Adolescents: The Role of Classroom Cultural Norms.中国青少年的攻击性与适应性:课堂文化规范的作用。
Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2025 Jun 12. doi: 10.1007/s10802-025-01336-8.
3
Empathy Changes Among Chinese College Students in the Context of Marketization.
市场化背景下中国大学生的同理心变化
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Apr 29;15(5):597. doi: 10.3390/bs15050597.
4
Mother-child collaboration in an Indigenous community: Changing and enduring across generations.母-婴协作在一个原住民社区:代际间的变化与延续。
Child Dev. 2024 Nov-Dec;95(6):1858-1878. doi: 10.1111/cdev.14181. Epub 2024 Nov 14.
5
A Farewell to the Narcissism Epidemic? A Cross-Temporal Meta-Analysis of Global NPI Scores (1982-2023).告别自恋流行?全球自恋人格量表得分(1982 - 2023年)的跨时间元分析
J Pers. 2025 Aug;93(4):884-894. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12982. Epub 2024 Oct 14.
6
Perspectives on early childhood development in China: key dimensions and contextual contributions.中国幼儿发展视角:关键维度与背景因素
Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 14;15:1370641. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1370641. eCollection 2024.
7
Young people on social media in a globalized world: self-optimization in highly competitive and achievement-oriented forms of life.全球化世界中社交媒体上的年轻人:在高度竞争和以成就为导向的生活形式中的自我优化。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jul 5;15:1340605. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1340605. eCollection 2024.
8
Principles for Adapting Assessments of Executive Function across Cultural Contexts.跨文化背景下调整执行功能评估的原则。
Brain Sci. 2024 Mar 27;14(4):318. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14040318.
9
Exploring the Impact of Social Media Sites on Compulsive Shopping Behavior: The Mediating Role of Materialism.探索社交媒体网站对强迫性购物行为的影响:物质主义的中介作用。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2024 Jan 16;17:171-185. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S442193. eCollection 2024.
10
People's political views, perceived social norms, and individualism shape their privacy concerns for and acceptance of pandemic control measures that use individual-level georeferenced data.人们的政治观点、感知到的社会规范和个人主义,塑造了他们对使用个人层面地理位置数据的疫情防控措施的隐私关注和接受程度。
Int J Health Geogr. 2023 Dec 6;22(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12942-023-00354-3.