Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, General Campus, Ottawa, ON.
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jul;33(7):2159-2164.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.01.058. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
Outpatient total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been made possible with advances in perioperative care and standardized clinical inpatient pathways. While many studies report on benefits of outpatient programs, none explore patient-reported outcome measures. As such, our goals were to compare the short-term quality of recovery; highlight postdischarge hospital resources utilization; and report on 2-year functional outcomes scores.
This was a prospective comparative cohort study of 43 inpatients (43 TKAs) and 43 outpatients (43 TKAs) operated on by a single surgeon between September 28, 2010 and May 5, 2015. All patients were given a diary to complete at 1, 3, 7, 14, and 28 days postoperatively; we collected 90-day complications, readmissions, and emergency department visits; Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index scores were completed preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively. SPSS (IBM, version 22.0) was used for all statistical analyses.
Quality of recovery (QoR-9) was similar in the outpatient TKA group compared with the inpatient group. No statistically significant differences were observed for Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index subscores (P > .05). There was 1 readmission in both outpatient and inpatient groups. Six inpatients and 8 outpatients returned to the emergency department for any reason within 90 days, with no statistical significance observed between the 2 groups (P = .771).
Outpatient TKA in selected patients produced similar short-term and 2-year patient-reported outcome measures and a comparable 90-day postdischarge hospital resource utilization when compared to an inpatient cohort, supporting further investigation into outpatient TKA.
随着围手术期护理的进步和标准化临床住院途径的建立,门诊全膝关节置换术(TKA)成为可能。虽然许多研究报告了门诊计划的益处,但没有研究探讨患者报告的结果测量指标。因此,我们的目标是比较短期恢复质量;突出出院后医院资源利用情况;并报告 2 年的功能结果评分。
这是一项前瞻性比较队列研究,纳入了 2010 年 9 月 28 日至 2015 年 5 月 5 日期间由同一位外科医生进行手术的 43 例住院患者(43 例 TKA)和 43 例门诊患者(43 例 TKA)。所有患者均被给予一份日记,要求在术后 1、3、7、14 和 28 天填写;我们收集了 90 天的并发症、再入院和急诊就诊情况;在术前和术后 2 年完成膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分(Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score)和西部安大略省和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index)评分。所有统计分析均使用 SPSS(IBM,版本 22.0)。
门诊 TKA 组的恢复质量(QoR-9)与住院组相似。Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score 和 Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index 亚量表的评分无统计学差异(P>.05)。门诊和住院组均有 1 例再入院。6 例住院患者和 8 例门诊患者在 90 天内因任何原因返回急诊,两组间无统计学差异(P=.771)。
与住院队列相比,选择合适的患者进行门诊 TKA 可产生类似的短期和 2 年患者报告结果测量指标和类似的出院后 90 天医院资源利用情况,支持进一步对门诊 TKA 进行研究。