Lund-Andersen Casper, Petersen Helen H, Jøns Christian, Philbert Berit T, Tfelt-Hansen Jacob, Skovgaard Lene T, Svendsen Jesper H
Department of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, Building 10.2 entr. A, P.O. Box 2099, DK-1014, Copenhagen, Denmark.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2018 Jun;52(1):103-110. doi: 10.1007/s10840-018-0334-2. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
Shortening of the QRS duration (QRSd) is often used to guide device optimization and reprogramming in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Detecting the small changes expected during reprogramming requires that the QRSd can be measured with high precision, but this has never been studied in patients with CRT. In this study, we wanted to assess the precision of automated QRSd measurement in patients treated with CRT using two commonly available electrocardiographs.
Patients treated with CRT were recruited during routine follow-up in our pacemaker clinic. In all participants, a number of immediate successive ECGs were recorded with the GE MAC 5500 (Mac55) and the GE MAC 1600 (Mac16). Data were analyzed with a linear mixed model.
A total of 785 12-lead ECGs were recorded in 36 patients with an average of 11.2 and 10.6 ECGs per patient with the Mac55 and Mac16, respectively. The Mac55 measured the QRSd longer by 10.3 milliseconds (ms) (95% CI 7.1-13.5 ms, p < 0.001) and with significantly smaller standard deviation for repeated measurements (6.3 vs. 10.4 ms, p < 0.001). Limits of agreement were ± 17.5 and ± 28.8 ms for the Mac55 and Mac16, respectively.
Automated measurement of QRSd in patients with CRT shows low precision with limits of agreement of ± 17.5 and ± 28.8 ms for repeated measurements in two commercially available electrocardiographs. Device programming solely by QRSd changes should be done with caution, and clinical effects should be demonstrated in future trials. Device programming based on QRSd changes should be done with caution until the ability of this measure to predict clinical outcome can be demonstrated in prospective study.
在心脏再同步治疗(CRT)患者中,QRS波时限(QRSd)缩短常被用于指导设备优化和重新编程。检测重新编程期间预期的微小变化需要高精度测量QRSd,但尚未在CRT患者中对此进行研究。在本研究中,我们希望使用两台常用心电图仪评估CRT治疗患者中自动测量QRSd的精度。
在我们起搏器门诊的常规随访期间招募接受CRT治疗的患者。对所有参与者,使用GE MAC 5500(Mac55)和GE MAC 1600(Mac16)记录一系列连续即刻心电图。数据采用线性混合模型分析。
36例患者共记录785份12导联心电图,Mac55和Mac16分别平均为每位患者记录11.2份和10.6份心电图。Mac55测得的QRSd长10.3毫秒(ms)(95%CI 7.1 - 13.5 ms,p < 0.001),重复测量的标准差显著更小(6.3对10.4 ms,p < 0.001)。Mac55和Mac16的一致性界限分别为±17.5和±28.8 ms。
CRT患者中自动测量QRSd显示精度较低,两台商用心电图仪重复测量的一致性界限分别为±17.5和±28.8 ms。仅根据QRSd变化进行设备编程应谨慎,且临床效果应在未来试验中得到证实。基于QRSd变化进行设备编程应谨慎,直至该测量预测临床结果的能力在前瞻性研究中得到证实。