Voudris Konstantinos V, Petropulos Peter, Karyofillis Panagiotis, Charitakis Konstantinos
Department of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago/Advocate Christ Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Department of Medicine, Advocate Christ Medical Center, 4440 W 95th Street, Suite 131 NOB, Oak Lawn, IL, 60453, USA.
Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2018 Mar 6;20(3):22. doi: 10.1007/s11936-018-0619-x.
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become an established therapy for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS). As the number of patients referred for TAVR increases, so does the prevalence of untreated obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in the population under evaluation. Despite the high prevalence of CAD in patients treated with TAVR, the management strategy of concomitant CAD in these patients remains an area of considerable uncertainty.
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with CAD and severe AS has been shown to be feasible and safe. Whether revascularization before, during, or after TAVR is optimal remains a subject of debate. All three approaches represent valid strategies with advantages and disadvantages that need to be carefully weighed on an individual basis. Current expert opinions recommend that PCI should be performed before or at the time of TAVR as long as the risk of the procedure does not outweigh the potential benefits. The results of large clinical trials evaluating the optimal revascularization time are closely awaited.
经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)已成为有症状的重度主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患者的既定治疗方法。随着接受TAVR治疗的患者数量增加,在接受评估的人群中,未经治疗的阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的患病率也随之上升。尽管接受TAVR治疗的患者中CAD患病率很高,但这些患者合并CAD的管理策略仍然存在很大的不确定性。
CAD合并重度AS患者的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)已被证明是可行且安全的。TAVR术前、术中和术后进行血运重建是否最佳仍存在争议。这三种方法都是有效的策略,各有优缺点,需要根据个体情况仔细权衡。目前专家意见建议,只要手术风险不超过潜在益处,PCI应在TAVR之前或同时进行。人们正密切期待评估最佳血运重建时间的大型临床试验结果。