• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

综合护理。

Integrated care.

作者信息

Warwick-Giles Lynsey, Checkland Kath

机构信息

Health Policy, Politics, Organisation Research Group, The University of Manchester , Manchester, UK.

出版信息

J Health Organ Manag. 2018 Mar 19;32(1):85-100. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-03-2017-0057. Epub 2018 Jan 4.

DOI:10.1108/JHOM-03-2017-0057
PMID:29508672
Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to try and understand how several organisations in one area in England are working together to develop an integrated care programme. Weick's (1995) concept of sensemaking is used as a lens to examine how the organisations are working collaboratively and maintaining the programme. Design/methodology/approach Qualitative methods included: non-participant observations of meetings, interviews with key stakeholders and the collection of documents relating to the programme. These provided wider contextual information about the programme. Comprehensive field notes were taken during observations and analysed alongside interview transcriptions using NVIVO software. Findings This paper illustrates the importance of the construction of a shared identity across all organisations involved in the programme. Furthermore, the wider policy discourse impacted on how the programme developed and influenced how organisations worked together. Originality/value The role of leaders from all organisations involved in the programme was of significance to the overall development of the programme and the sustained momentum behind the programme. Leaders were able to generate a "narrative of success" to drive the programme forward. This is of particular relevance to evaluators, highlighting the importance of using multiple methods to allow researchers to probe beneath the surface of programmes to ensure that evidence moves beyond this public narrative.

摘要

目的 本文旨在尝试理解英格兰某一地区的几个组织如何共同努力制定一项综合护理计划。运用韦克(1995)的意义建构概念作为视角,审视这些组织如何协作并维持该计划。

设计/方法/途径 定性方法包括:对会议进行非参与式观察、与关键利益相关者进行访谈以及收集与该计划相关的文件。这些提供了关于该计划更广泛的背景信息。在观察期间记录了全面的实地笔记,并使用NVIVO软件与访谈转录本一起进行分析。

研究结果 本文阐述了在参与该计划的所有组织中构建共享身份的重要性。此外,更广泛的政策话语影响了该计划的发展方式,并影响了组织之间的合作方式。

原创性/价值 参与该计划的所有组织的领导者的角色对该计划的整体发展以及该计划背后的持续动力具有重要意义。领导者能够生成“成功叙事”来推动该计划前进。这对评估者尤其具有相关性,突出了使用多种方法的重要性,以便研究人员能够深入探究计划的表面之下,确保证据超越这种公开叙事。

相似文献

1
Integrated care.综合护理。
J Health Organ Manag. 2018 Mar 19;32(1):85-100. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-03-2017-0057. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
2
The institutional logic of integrated care: an ethnography of patient transitions.综合护理的制度逻辑:患者转诊的人种志研究
J Health Organ Manag. 2017 Mar 20;31(1):82-95. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-06-2016-0123.
3
Sensemaking: a driving force behind the integration of professional practices.意义建构:专业实践整合的推动力量。
J Health Organ Manag. 2012;26(6):737-57. doi: 10.1108/14777261211276998.
4
Shared mental models of integrated care: aligning multiple stakeholder perspectives.整合护理的共享心理模型:协调多方利益相关者的观点。
J Health Organ Manag. 2012;26(6):713-36. doi: 10.1108/14777261211276989.
5
Driving digital health transformation in hospitals: a formative qualitative evaluation of the English Global Digital Exemplar programme.推动医院数字化健康转型:英国全球数字典范项目的形成性定性评估。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2021 Dec;28(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2021-100429.
6
Tracing healthcare organisation integration in the UK using actor-network theory.利用行动者网络理论追踪英国的医疗保健组织整合。
J Health Organ Manag. 2020 Feb 14;34(2):192-206. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-12-2019-0339.
7
8
High performance work systems: the gap between policy and practice in health care reform.高绩效工作系统:医疗改革中政策与实践的差距。
J Health Organ Manag. 2011;25(3):281-97. doi: 10.1108/14777261111143536.
9
Institutionalizing integrated treatment for concurrent disorders: creating new organizational discourse.将共病的综合治疗制度化:创造新的组织话语。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2013 Jan-Mar;38(1):51-60. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0b013e31824b1c54.
10
Organisational development to support integrated care in East London: the perspective of clinicians and social workers on the ground.组织发展以支持东伦敦的综合护理:临床医生和社会工作者的实地视角。
J Health Organ Manag. 2020 May 16;34(5):603-619. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-10-2019-0294.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of the Enhanced Universal Support Offer to Care Homes during COVID-19 in the UK: Evaluation using appreciative inquiry.英国在 COVID-19 期间向护理院提供强化普遍支持的影响:运用欣赏式探询进行评估。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Sep;30(5):e1824-e1834. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13612. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
2
A Metagovernance Model of Innovation Networks in the Health and Social Services Using a Neo-Schumpeterian Framework.基于新熊彼特主义框架的卫生和社会服务创新网络元治理模型
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 6;18(11):6133. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18116133.
3
(Dis)Integrated Care? Lessons from East London.
(非)整合式照护?来自东伦敦的经验教训。
Int J Integr Care. 2020 Oct 19;20(4):2. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5432.