Warwick-Giles Lynsey, Checkland Kath
Health Policy, Politics, Organisation Research Group, The University of Manchester , Manchester, UK.
J Health Organ Manag. 2018 Mar 19;32(1):85-100. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-03-2017-0057. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to try and understand how several organisations in one area in England are working together to develop an integrated care programme. Weick's (1995) concept of sensemaking is used as a lens to examine how the organisations are working collaboratively and maintaining the programme. Design/methodology/approach Qualitative methods included: non-participant observations of meetings, interviews with key stakeholders and the collection of documents relating to the programme. These provided wider contextual information about the programme. Comprehensive field notes were taken during observations and analysed alongside interview transcriptions using NVIVO software. Findings This paper illustrates the importance of the construction of a shared identity across all organisations involved in the programme. Furthermore, the wider policy discourse impacted on how the programme developed and influenced how organisations worked together. Originality/value The role of leaders from all organisations involved in the programme was of significance to the overall development of the programme and the sustained momentum behind the programme. Leaders were able to generate a "narrative of success" to drive the programme forward. This is of particular relevance to evaluators, highlighting the importance of using multiple methods to allow researchers to probe beneath the surface of programmes to ensure that evidence moves beyond this public narrative.
目的 本文旨在尝试理解英格兰某一地区的几个组织如何共同努力制定一项综合护理计划。运用韦克(1995)的意义建构概念作为视角,审视这些组织如何协作并维持该计划。
设计/方法/途径 定性方法包括:对会议进行非参与式观察、与关键利益相关者进行访谈以及收集与该计划相关的文件。这些提供了关于该计划更广泛的背景信息。在观察期间记录了全面的实地笔记,并使用NVIVO软件与访谈转录本一起进行分析。
研究结果 本文阐述了在参与该计划的所有组织中构建共享身份的重要性。此外,更广泛的政策话语影响了该计划的发展方式,并影响了组织之间的合作方式。
原创性/价值 参与该计划的所有组织的领导者的角色对该计划的整体发展以及该计划背后的持续动力具有重要意义。领导者能够生成“成功叙事”来推动该计划前进。这对评估者尤其具有相关性,突出了使用多种方法的重要性,以便研究人员能够深入探究计划的表面之下,确保证据超越这种公开叙事。