• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者和公众参与早期预警活动:来自英国的一个范例。

PATIENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT IN EARLY AWARENESS AND ALERT ACTIVITIES: AN EXAMPLE FROM THE UNITED KINGDOM.

机构信息

NIHR Horizon Scanning Research & Intelligence Centre (HSRIC),Institute of Applied Health Research,University of

NIHR Horizon Scanning Research & Intelligence Centre (HSRIC),Institute of Applied Health Research.

出版信息

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2018 Jan;34(1):10-17. doi: 10.1017/S0266462317004421.

DOI:10.1017/S0266462317004421
PMID:29508684
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to report on the experiences, benefits, and challenges of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) from a publicly funded early awareness and alert (EAA) system in the United Kingdom.

METHODS

Using email, telephone, a Web site portal, Twitter and focus groups, patients and the public were involved and engaged in the recognized stages of an EAA system: identification, filtration, prioritization, early assessment, and dissemination.

RESULTS

Approaches for PPIE were successfully integrated into all aspects of the National Institute for Health Research Horizon Scanning Research and Intelligence Centre's EAA system. Input into identification activities was not as beneficial as involvement in prioritization and early assessment. Patients gave useful insight into the Centre's Web site and engaging patients using Twitter has enabled the Centre to disseminate outputs to a wider audience.

CONCLUSIONS

EAA systems should consider involving and engaging with patients and the public in identification, prioritization, and assessment of emerging health technologies where practicable. Further research is required to examine the value and impact of PPIE in EAA activities and in the early development of health technologies.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在报告英国一个由公共资金支持的早期预警系统中患者和公众参与(PPIE)的经验、益处和挑战。

方法

通过电子邮件、电话、网站门户、Twitter 和焦点小组,患者和公众参与并参与了早期预警系统的各个公认阶段:识别、筛选、优先排序、早期评估和传播。

结果

PPIE 的方法成功地融入了国家卫生研究院视野扫描研究和情报中心早期预警系统的各个方面。在识别活动中的投入不如在优先排序和早期评估中的投入有益。患者为中心的网站提供了有用的见解,并通过使用 Twitter 与患者互动,使中心能够将产出传播给更广泛的受众。

结论

早期预警系统应考虑在可行的情况下让患者和公众参与新兴健康技术的识别、优先排序和评估。需要进一步研究以检验 PPIE 在早期预警活动和健康技术早期开发中的价值和影响。

相似文献

1
PATIENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT IN EARLY AWARENESS AND ALERT ACTIVITIES: AN EXAMPLE FROM THE UNITED KINGDOM.患者和公众参与早期预警活动:来自英国的一个范例。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2018 Jan;34(1):10-17. doi: 10.1017/S0266462317004421.
2
Implementing a national early awareness and alert system for new and emerging health technologies in Italy: the COTE Project.在意大利实施新出现的卫生技术国家早期预警和警报系统:COTE 项目。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012 Jul;28(3):321-6. doi: 10.1017/S0266462312000384.
3
Early awareness and alert activities in Latin America: current situation in four countries.拉丁美洲的早期预警活动:四个国家的现状。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012 Jul;28(3):315-20. doi: 10.1017/S0266462312000311.
4
Early awareness and alert systems: an overview of EuroScan methods.早期预警系统:EuroScan 方法概述。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012 Jul;28(3):301-7. doi: 10.1017/S0266462312000360.
5
An uneven spread: a review of public involvement in the National Institute of Health Research's Health Technology Assessment program.不均衡的分布:国家卫生研究院健康技术评估计划中公众参与情况的回顾。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011 Oct;27(4):343-7. doi: 10.1017/S0266462311000559.
6
The Early Awareness and Alert System in Sweden: History and Current Status.瑞典的早期意识与警报系统:历史与现状
Front Pharmacol. 2017 Oct 5;8:674. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00674. eCollection 2017.
7
Analyzing 10 years of early awareness and alert activity in the United kingdom.分析英国 10 年来的早期预警活动。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012 Jul;28(3):308-14. doi: 10.1017/S026646231200030X.
8
An international survey of the public engagement practices of health technology assessment organizations.一项针对健康技术评估组织公众参与实践的国际调查。
Value Health. 2013 Jan-Feb;16(1):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.09.011.
9
Early warning of new health care technologies in the United Kingdom.英国新医疗技术的早期预警。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1998 Fall;14(4):680-6. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300011995.
10
Community views and perspectives on public engagement in health technology assessment decision making.社区对公众参与卫生技术评估决策的看法和观点。
Aust Health Rev. 2017 Mar;41(1):68-74. doi: 10.1071/AH15221.

引用本文的文献

1
Looking at the fringes of MedTech innovation: a mapping review of horizon scanning and foresight methods.关注医疗技术创新的边缘:一项关于地平线扫描和展望方法的制图综述。
BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 14;13(9):e073730. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073730.
2
Roles, outcomes, and enablers within research partnerships: A rapid review of the literature on patient and public involvement and engagement in health research.研究伙伴关系中的角色、成果与促进因素:关于患者及公众参与健康研究的文献快速综述
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Jun 15;9(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00448-z.
3
Potential Barriers of Patient Involvement in Health Technology Assessment in Central and Eastern European Countries.
中东欧国家中患者参与健康技术评估的潜在障碍。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 28;10:922708. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.922708. eCollection 2022.
4
Is Co-production Just a Pipe Dream for Applied Health Research Commissioning? An Exploratory Literature Review.联合生产对于应用健康研究委托而言只是一个白日梦吗?一项探索性文献综述。
Front Sociol. 2019 Jun 24;4:50. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2019.00050. eCollection 2019.
5
Co-construction of health technology assessment recommendations with patients: An example with cardiac defibrillator replacement.与患者共同构建卫生技术评估建议:以心脏除颤器更换为例。
Health Expect. 2020 Feb;23(1):182-192. doi: 10.1111/hex.12989. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
6
Scanning the horizon: a systematic literature review of methodologies.扫描地平线:方法学的系统文献综述。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 27;9(5):e026764. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026764.