Sidani Souraya, Bootzin Richard R, Epstein Dana R, Miranda Joyal, Cousins Jennifer
Daphne Cockwell School of Nursing, Ryerson University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, United States.
Can J Nurs Res. 2015 Mar;47(1):35-52. doi: 10.1177/084456211504700104.
Adherence to treatment is critical in determining the effects of behavioural therapy and may be affected by participants' preference for treatment. The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which method of allocation to treatment (random vs. preference-based) influences adherence (exposure and enactment) to behavioural therapy. Participants received behavioural therapy for the management of insomnia randomly or by preference. Exposure was assessed as attendance at the treatment sessions, enactment as self-reported application of treatment recommendations. Participants (N = 262) attended a mean of 5.6 treatment sessions, applied the treatment recommendations frequently, and reported high levels of overall compliance. There was no difference between the random and preference groups in terms of exposure to and enactment of treatment. Randomization to the preferred treatment, dissatisfaction with the allocated treatment, and self-report bias could play a role in the findings and should be explored in future research.
