Ohtori Seiji, Orita Sumihisa, Eguchi Yawara, Aoki Yasuchika, Suzuki Miyako, Kubota Gou, Inage Kazuhide, Shiga Yasuhiro, Abe Koki, Kinoshita Hideyuki, Inoue Masahiro, Kanamoto Hirohito, Norimoto Masaki, Umimura Tomotaka, Furuya Takeo, Masao Koda, Maki Satoshi, Akazawa Tsutomu, Takahashi Kazuhisa
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Oct 1;43(19):1347-1354. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002620.
A retrospective study.
The aim of this study was to determine the publication rate and impact factors (IFs) among all abstracts presented at the 2010 and 2012 meetings of the International Society for the Study of Lumbar Spine (ISSLS).
The publication rate of abstracts presented at overseas meetings was reported to be around 50%. However, the publication rate and IFs of oral and poster presentations made at ISSLS meetings were unclear. Moreover, whether the publication rates and IFs differed for papers associated with oral or poster presentations at ISSLS meetings was unknown.
We investigated all 1126 abstracts (oral, special posters, general posters) presented at ISSLS meetings held between 2010 and 2012. PubMed was searched to identify publications and IFs were determined using journal citation reports. We also compared the publication rates and IFs between oral and poster presentations.
The overall publication rate was 50.1% for three ISSLS meetings (564 publications/1126 abstracts). The overall publication rate for oral presentations, special posters, and general posters given in the 2010 to 2012 meetings was 62.0%, 48.3, and 46.6%, respectively. Overall, papers related to oral presentations had significantly higher publication rates than those of special and general posters (P = 0.0002). The average IFs of publications associated with abstracts presented at three ISSLS meetings was 2.802 for oral presentations, 2.593 for special posters, and 2.589 for general posters. There were no significant differences in average IFs between oral and poster presentations (P > 0.05).
The publication rate for abstracts presented at ISSLS meetings was high and similar to publication rates for abstracts presented at other meetings concerning orthopedic and spine research. However, there was no significant difference in IFs between oral and poster presentations, suggesting that abstract evaluations cannot predict IFs of the eventual publication.
一项回顾性研究。
本研究旨在确定在国际腰椎研究学会（ISSLS）2010年和2012年会议上展示的所有摘要的发表率及影响因子（IFs）。
据报道，在海外会议上展示的摘要发表率约为50%。然而，ISSLS会议上口头报告和壁报展示的发表率及IFs尚不清楚。此外，ISSLS会议上与口头报告或壁报展示相关的论文发表率和IFs是否存在差异也未知。
我们调查了2010年至2012年期间ISSLS会议上展示的所有1126篇摘要（口头报告、专题壁报、普通壁报）。通过搜索PubMed来确定出版物，并使用期刊引证报告确定IFs。我们还比较了口头报告和壁报展示之间的发表率和IFs。
ISSLS的三次会议总体发表率为50.1%（564篇出版物/1126篇摘要）。2010年至2012年会议上口头报告、专题壁报和普通壁报的总体发表率分别为62.0%、48.3%和46.6%。总体而言，与口头报告相关的论文发表率显著高于专题壁报和普通壁报（P = 0.0002）。在ISSLS的三次会议上，与摘要展示相关的出版物的平均IFs，口头报告为2.802，专题壁报为2.593，普通壁报为2.589。口头报告和壁报展示之间的平均IFs无显著差异（P>0.05）。
在ISSLS会议上展示的摘要发表率较高，与其他骨科和脊柱研究会议上展示的摘要发表率相似。然而，口头报告和壁报展示之间的IFs无显著差异，这表明摘要评估无法预测最终发表的IFs。
4级。
