Avery Robin K, Silveira Fernanda P, Benedict Kaitlin, Cleveland Angela A, Kauffman Carol A, Schuster Mindy G, Dubberke Erik R, Husain Shahid, Paterson David L, Chiller Tom, Pappas Peter
Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Transpl Infect Dis. 2018 Jun;20(3):e12877. doi: 10.1111/tid.12877. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
Most studies of post-transplant CMV infection have focused on either solid organ or hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients. A large prospective cohort study involving both lung and HCT recipients provided an opportunity to compare the epidemiology and outcomes of CMV infections in these 2 groups.
Patients were followed up for 30 months in a 6-center prospective cohort study. Data on demographics, CMV infections, tissue-invasive disease, recurrences, rejection, and immunosuppression were recorded.
The overall incidence of CMV infection was 83/293 (28.3%) in the lung transplant group and 154/444 (34.7%) in the HCT group (P = .0706). Tissue-invasive CMV disease occurred in 8/83 (9.6%) of lung and 6/154 (3.9%) of HCT recipients with CMV infection, respectively (P = .087). Median time to CMV infection was longer in the lung transplant group (236 vs 40 days, P < .0001), likely reflecting the effects of prophylaxis vs preemptive therapy. Total IgG levels of < 350 mg/dL in lung recipients and graft vs host disease (GvHD) in HCT recipients were associated with increased CMV risk. HCT recipients had a higher mean number of CMV episodes (P = .008), although duration of viremia was not significantly different between the 2 groups. CMV infection was not associated with reduced overall survival in either group.
Current CMV prevention strategies have resulted in a low incidence of tissue-invasive disease in both lung transplant and HCT, although CMV viremia is still relatively common. Differences between the lung and HCT groups in terms of time to CMV and recurrences of CMV viremia likely reflect differences in underlying host immunobiology and in CMV prevention strategies in the modern era.
大多数关于移植后巨细胞病毒(CMV)感染的研究都集中在实体器官移植或造血细胞移植(HCT)受者身上。一项涉及肺移植和HCT受者的大型前瞻性队列研究提供了一个机会,来比较这两组中CMV感染的流行病学和结局。
在一项6中心前瞻性队列研究中,对患者进行了30个月的随访。记录了人口统计学、CMV感染、组织侵袭性疾病、复发、排斥反应和免疫抑制的数据。
肺移植组CMV感染的总体发生率为83/293(28.3%),HCT组为154/444(34.7%)(P = 0.0706)。分别有8/83(9.6%)的肺移植和6/154(3.9%)的HCT CMV感染受者发生了组织侵袭性CMV疾病(P = 0.087)。肺移植组CMV感染的中位时间更长(236天对40天,P < 0.0001),这可能反映了预防与抢先治疗的效果。肺移植受者总IgG水平< 350 mg/dL以及HCT受者发生移植物抗宿主病(GvHD)与CMV风险增加相关。HCT受者的CMV发作平均次数更高(P = 0.008),尽管两组之间病毒血症持续时间无显著差异。CMV感染与两组的总体生存率降低均无关。
目前的CMV预防策略已导致肺移植和HCT中组织侵袭性疾病的发生率较低,尽管CMV病毒血症仍然相对常见。肺移植组和HCT组在CMV感染时间和CMV病毒血症复发方面的差异可能反映了现代潜在宿主免疫生物学和CMV预防策略的差异。