Lautz Andrew J, Martin Kelly C, Nishisaki Akira, Bonafide Christopher P, Hales Roberta L, Hunt Elizabeth A, Nadkarni Vinay M, Sutton Robert M, Boyer Donald L
Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati and Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio;
Divisions of Critical Care Medicine and.
Hosp Pediatr. 2018 Apr;8(4):227-231. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2017-0173. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
Miscommunication has been implicated as a leading cause of medical errors, and standardized handover programs have been associated with improved patient outcomes. However, the role of structured handovers in pediatric emergencies remains unclear. We sought to determine if training with an airway, breathing, circulation, situation, background, assessment, recommendation handover tool could improve the transmission of essential patient information during multidisciplinary simulations of critically ill children.
We conducted a prospective, randomized, intervention study with first-year pediatric residents at a quaternary academic children's hospital. Baseline and second handovers were recorded for residents in the intervention group ( 12) and residents in the control group ( = 8) during multidisciplinary simulations throughout the academic year. The intervention group received handover education after baseline handover observation and a cognitive aid before second handover observation. Audio-recorded handovers were scored by using a Delphi-developed assessment tool by a blinded rater.
There was no difference in baseline handover scores between groups ( = .69), but second handover scores were significantly higher in the intervention group (median 12.5 [interquartile range 12-13] versus median 7.5 [interquartile range 6-8] in the control group; < .01). Trained residents were more likely to include a reason for the call ( < .01), focused history ( = .02), and summative assessment ( = .03). Neither timing of the second observation in the academic year nor duration between first and second observation were associated with the second handover scores (both > .5).
Structured handover training and provision of a cognitive aid may improve the inclusion of essential patient information in the handover of simulated critically ill children.
沟通不畅被认为是医疗差错的主要原因之一,标准化的交接班程序与改善患者预后相关。然而,结构化交接班在儿科急诊中的作用仍不明确。我们试图确定使用气道、呼吸、循环、情况、背景、评估、建议交接工具进行培训是否能在危重症儿童多学科模拟过程中改善重要患者信息的传递。
我们在一家四级学术儿童医院对一年级儿科住院医师进行了一项前瞻性、随机、干预性研究。在整个学年的多学科模拟过程中,记录了干预组(12名)和对照组(8名)住院医师的基线和第二次交接班情况。干预组在基线交接班观察后接受了交接班教育,并在第二次交接班观察前获得了一种认知辅助工具。由一名盲法评分者使用德尔菲法开发的评估工具对录音的交接班进行评分。
两组基线交接班评分无差异(P = 0.69),但干预组第二次交接班评分显著更高(中位数12.5[四分位间距12 - 13],而对照组中位数为7.5[四分位间距6 - 8];P < 0.01)。接受培训的住院医师更有可能包括呼叫原因(P < 0.01)、重点病史(P = 0.02)和总结性评估(P = 0.03)。学年中第二次观察的时间以及第一次和第二次观察之间的时长均与第二次交接班评分无关(两者P > 0.5)。
结构化交接班培训和提供认知辅助工具可能会改善在模拟危重症儿童交接班过程中重要患者信息的包含情况。