Traboulsi Henri, Teixido Michael
Christiana Care Health Systems, Newark, DE, USA.
Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA.
World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Jun 8;3(3):163-168. doi: 10.1016/j.wjorl.2017.01.005. eCollection 2017 Sep.
INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVE: Multiple canal BPPV can be a diagnostic challenge to the clinician. This is due in part to the complex anatomy of the labyrinth but also to complex and often simultaneous ocular responses that result from stimulation of multiple canals during traditional diagnostic testing. Our objective was to analyze the Dix-Hallpike maneuver used in the diagnosis of BPPV to look for patterns of simultaneous canal response and to develop a diagnostic maneuver that will allow separation of canal responses in multiple canal BPPV.
A previously created and published 3D biomechanical model of the human labyrinths for the study of BPPV was used to analyze and compare the position and movement of otoliths in the Dix-Hallpike maneuver as well as in a proposed expanded version of the traditional Dix-Hallpike maneuver.
The traditional Dix-Hallpike maneuver with the head hanging may promote movement of otoliths in 5 of the six semicircular canals. The Dix-Hallpike maneuver with the head lowered only to the horizontal position allows for otoconia in only the lowermost posterior canal to fall to the most gravity dependent position. This position allows for minimal or no movement of otoconia in the contralateral posterior canal, or in either superior canal. Turning the head ninety degrees to the opposite side while still in the horizontal position will provoke otolith movement in only the contralateral posterior canal. The superior canals can then be examined for free otolith debris by extending the neck to a head-hanging position. These positions may be assumed directly from one to the next in the lying position. There seems to be no advantage to sitting up between positions.
The Dix-Hallpike maneuver may cause simultaneous movement of otoliths present in multiple canals and create an obstacle to accurate diagnosis in multi-canal BPPV. An expanded Dix-Hallpike maneuver is described which adds intermediate steps with the head positioned to the right and left in the horizontal position before head-hanging. This expanded maneuver has helped to isolate affected semi-circular canals for individual assessment in multiple canal BPPV.
引言/目的:多管型耳石症对临床医生来说可能是一个诊断难题。部分原因在于迷路的解剖结构复杂,还在于传统诊断测试期间刺激多个半规管时产生的复杂且常常同时出现的眼震反应。我们的目的是分析用于耳石症诊断的 Dix-Hallpike 手法,以寻找同时出现的半规管反应模式,并开发一种诊断手法,以便在多管型耳石症中区分各个半规管的反应。
使用先前创建并发表的用于耳石症研究的人体迷路三维生物力学模型,来分析和比较 Dix-Hallpike 手法以及传统 Dix-Hallpike 手法的拟扩展版本中耳石的位置和运动。
头部下垂的传统 Dix-Hallpike 手法可能会促使六个半规管中的五个出现耳石运动。头部仅降低到水平位置的 Dix-Hallpike 手法仅能使最下方后半规管中的耳石落到最依赖重力的位置。此位置能使对侧后半规管或任一上半规管中的耳石极少移动或不移动。在仍处于水平位置时将头向对侧转动 90 度只会激发对侧后半规管中的耳石运动。然后通过将颈部伸展到头下垂位置,可以检查上半规管中是否有游离的耳石碎片。这些位置可以在卧位时直接从一个依次转换到下一个。在不同位置之间坐起似乎没有优势。
Dix-Hallpike 手法可能会导致多个半规管中存在的耳石同时移动,并给多管型耳石症的准确诊断造成障碍。本文描述了一种扩展的 Dix-Hallpike 手法,该手法在头下垂之前增加了头部在水平位置向左右两侧定位的中间步骤。这种扩展手法有助于在多管型耳石症中分离出受影响的半规管以便进行单独评估。