Silva Mauricio, Sadlik Gal, Avoian Tigran, Ebramzadeh Edward
Orthopaedic Institute for Children.
UCLA/Orthopaedic Hospital Department of Orthopaedics, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA.
J Pediatr Orthop. 2018 Apr;38(4):223-229. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000802.
The ideal type of immobilization for nondisplaced pediatric elbow fractures has not been established. We hypothesized that the use of a long-arm cylinder made of soft cast material will result in similar outcomes to those obtained with a traditional long-arm hard cast.
We randomly assigned 100 consecutive children who presented with a closed, nondisplaced, type I supracondylar humeral fracture or an occult, closed, acute elbow injury, to 1 of 2 groups: group A (n=50) received a long-arm, traditional fiberglass (hard) cast. Group B (n=50) received a long-arm, soft fiberglass cast. After 4 weeks, the cast was removed in group A by a member of our staff using a cast saw, and in group B by one of the patient's parents by rolling back the soft fiberglass material. We compared the amount of fracture displacement and/or angulation, recovery of range of motion, elbow pain, and patient satisfaction.
There were no instances of unplanned removal of the cast by the patient or parent. No evidence of fracture displacement or angulation was seen in either group. The final carrying angle of the affected elbow was nearly identical of that of the normal, contralateral elbow in both groups (P=0.64). At the latest follow-up appointment, elbows in groups A and B had a similar mean arc of motion (156 vs. 154 degrees; P=0.45), and had achieved identical relative arc of motion of 99.6% and 99.5% of that of the normal, contralateral side, respectively (P=0.94). Main pain scores were low and comparable over the study period. All patients in both groups reported the highest rate of satisfaction at the eighth week of follow-up.
The results indicate that children with nondisplaced supracondylar humeral fractures can be successfully managed with the use of a removable long-arm soft cast, maintaining fracture alignment and resulting in comparable rates of range of motion, pain, and patient satisfaction. The use of a removable immobilization that can reliably maintain fracture alignment and result in similar outcomes, while minimizing the risk of noncompliance, could be advantageous. Although we elected to remove the soft cast during a scheduled follow-up, it appears that such immobilization could be removed easily and safely at home, potentially resulting in a lower number of patient visits, decreased health care costs, and higher patient/parent satisfaction.
Level I.
对于无移位的小儿肘部骨折,理想的固定类型尚未确定。我们假设使用由软质石膏材料制成的长臂管型石膏将产生与传统长臂硬质石膏相似的结果。
我们将100例连续出现闭合性、无移位的I型肱骨髁上骨折或隐匿性、闭合性急性肘部损伤的儿童随机分为2组:A组(n = 50)接受长臂传统玻璃纤维(硬质)石膏固定。B组(n = 50)接受长臂软质玻璃纤维石膏固定。4周后,A组由我们的工作人员使用石膏锯拆除石膏,B组由患者的一位家长通过回卷软质玻璃纤维材料拆除石膏。我们比较了骨折移位和/或成角的程度、活动范围的恢复情况、肘部疼痛以及患者满意度。
患者或家长均未出现计划外拆除石膏的情况。两组均未发现骨折移位或成角的证据。两组中患侧肘部的最终提携角与正常对侧肘部几乎相同(P = 0.64)。在最近的随访预约时,A组和B组肘部的平均活动弧度相似(156°对154°;P = 0.45),并且相对于正常对侧的活动弧度分别达到了99.6%和99.5%,二者相同(P = 0.94)。在研究期间,主要疼痛评分较低且相当。两组所有患者在随访的第八周报告的满意度最高。
结果表明,对于无移位的肱骨髁上骨折患儿,使用可拆除的长臂软质石膏固定能够成功治疗,维持骨折对线,并在活动范围、疼痛和患者满意度方面产生相似的比率。使用能够可靠维持骨折对线并产生相似结果,同时将不依从风险降至最低的可拆除固定装置可能具有优势。尽管我们选择在预定的随访期间拆除软质石膏,但似乎这种固定装置可以在家中轻松安全地拆除,可能会减少患者就诊次数、降低医疗成本并提高患者/家长满意度。
I级