Suppr超能文献

内镜辅助下外阴癌腹股沟淋巴结清扫术

Endoscopy-assisted inguinal lymphadenectomy in vulvar cancer.

作者信息

Le Aiwen, Xiong Jie, Wang Zhonghai, Dai Xiao Yun, Xiao Tian Hui, Zhuo Rong, Xu Ya Hong, Yuan Rui

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Nanshan Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518052, China.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400011, China.

出版信息

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018 May;297(5):1277-1283. doi: 10.1007/s00404-018-4732-6. Epub 2018 Mar 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore the feasibility and efficiency of video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL) for vulvar cancer.

METHODS

We evaluated 46 patients with vulvar cancer. Treatment included VEIL using the hypogastric subcutaneous approach (VEIL-H, 17 patients), VEIL with the limb subcutaneous surgical approach (VEIL-L, 8 patients), and open inguinal lymphadenectomy (OIL, 21 patients). All patients underwent radical vulvectomy; we evaluated operative time, the amount of bleeding, SF score, recurrence rate, etc. RESULTS: The durations of VEIL-H and VEIL-L were 170.79 ± 18.92 and 180.12 ± 17.88 min, respectively, which were longer than that of OIL (100.68 ± 11.37 min; P = 0.028). Bleeding volumes in the VEIL-H and VEIL-L groups were 15.23 ± 2.17 and 17.16 ± 2.35 ml, respectively; there were significantly lower than that of the OIL group (36.68 ± 3.48 ml; P = 0.021). The numbers of unilateral lymph nodes harvested were similar in all groups. The duration of hospitalization in VEIL group was shorter than that of the OIL group. There were less skin and lymphatic complications after VEIL than after OIL. Total SF-36 scores were significantly higher in the VEIL group than that in the OIL group (P = 0.032). There were no statistically significant differences in local recurrence, distant metastasis, and mortality among the three groups.

CONCLUSION

VEIL for vulvar cancer treatment is effective, with the advantages of short hospitalization stay, less bleeding, and reduced postoperative complications comparing the OIL.

摘要

目的

探讨视频内镜下腹股沟淋巴结切除术(VEIL)治疗外阴癌的可行性和有效性。

方法

我们评估了46例外阴癌患者。治疗方法包括采用腹下皮下入路的VEIL(VEIL-H,17例患者)、采用肢体皮下手术入路的VEIL(VEIL-L,8例患者)以及开放性腹股沟淋巴结切除术(OIL,21例患者)。所有患者均接受了根治性外阴切除术;我们评估了手术时间、出血量、SF评分、复发率等。结果:VEIL-H和VEIL-L的手术时间分别为170.79±18.92分钟和180.12±17.88分钟,均长于OIL(100.68±11.37分钟;P=0.028)。VEIL-H组和VEIL-L组的出血量分别为15.23±2.17毫升和17.16±2.35毫升,均显著低于OIL组(36.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验