• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项多中心绩效改进计划使用农村创伤筛选标准进行基准评估:结果评价

A Multicenter Performance Improvement Program Uses Rural Trauma Filters for Benchmarking: An Evaluation of the Findings.

作者信息

Coniglio Ray, McGraw Constance, Archuleta Mike, Bentler Heather, Keiter Leigh, Ramstetter Julie, Reis Elizabeth, Romans Cristi, Schell Rachael, Ross Kelli, Smith Rachel, Townsend Jodi, Orlando Alessandro, Mains Charles W

机构信息

Trauma and Prehospital Services, Centura Health Trauma System, Centennial, Colorado (Messrs Coniglio, Archuleta, and Orlando, Mss McGraw, Bentler, Keiter, Ramstetter, Reis, Romans, Schell, Simms, Smith, and Townsend, and Dr Mains); Trauma Services Department, St Anthony Hospital, Lakewood, Colorado (Messrs Coniglio, Archuleta and Orlando, Ms McGraw, and Dr Mains); Trauma Research Department, Swedish Medical Center, Englewood, Colorado (Ms McGraw and Mr Orlando); and Trauma Services Department, Penrose St-Francis Hospital, Colorado Springs, Colorado (Ms McGraw, Mrs Coniglio, Archuleta, and Orlando, and Dr Mains).

出版信息

J Trauma Nurs. 2018 Mar/Apr;25(2):139-145. doi: 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000337.

DOI:10.1097/JTN.0000000000000337
PMID:29521783
Abstract

Colorado requires Level III and IV trauma centers to conduct a formal performance improvement program (PI), but provides limited support for program development. Trauma program managers and coordinators in rural facilities rarely have experience in the development or management of a PI program. As a result, rural trauma centers often face challenges in evaluating trauma outcomes adequately. Through a multidisciplinary outreach program, our Trauma System worked with a group of rural trauma centers to identify and define seven specific PI filters based on key program elements of rural trauma centers. This retrospective observational project sought to develop and examine these PI filters so as to enhance the review and evaluation of patient care. The project included 924 trauma patients from eight Level IV and one Level III trauma centers. Seven PI filters were retrospectively collected and analyzed by quarter in 2016: prehospital managed airway for patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of less than 9; adherence to trauma team activation criteria; evidence of physician team leader presence within 20 min of activation; patient with a GCS score less than 9 in the emergency department (ED): intubated in less than 20 min; ED length of stay (LOS) less than 4 hr from patient arrival to transfer; adherence to admission criteria; documentation of GCS on arrival, discharge, or with change of status. There was a significantly increasing compliance trend toward appropriate documentation of GCS (p trend < .001) and a significantly decreasing compliance trend for ED LOS of less than 4 hr (p trend = .04). Moving forward, these data will be used to develop compliance thresholds, to identify areas for improvement, and create corrective action plans as necessary.

摘要

科罗拉多州要求三级和四级创伤中心开展正式的绩效改进项目(PI),但在项目开发方面提供的支持有限。农村医疗机构的创伤项目管理人员和协调员很少有PI项目开发或管理的经验。因此,农村创伤中心在充分评估创伤治疗结果方面常常面临挑战。通过一个多学科外展项目,我们的创伤系统与一组农村创伤中心合作,根据农村创伤中心的关键项目要素确定并定义了七个特定的PI筛选指标。这个回顾性观察项目旨在开发并检验这些PI筛选指标,以加强对患者护理的审查和评估。该项目纳入了来自八个四级创伤中心和一个三级创伤中心的924名创伤患者。2016年按季度回顾性收集并分析了七个PI筛选指标:格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分低于9分的患者在院前进行气道管理;遵守创伤团队启动标准;启动后20分钟内有医师团队负责人在场的证据;急诊科(ED)中GCS评分低于9分的患者:在20分钟内进行插管;从患者到达至转运,ED住院时间(LOS)少于4小时;遵守入院标准;到达、出院或状态改变时GCS的记录。GCS适当记录的依从性呈显著上升趋势(p趋势<.001),而ED LOS少于4小时的依从性呈显著下降趋势(p趋势=.04)。展望未来,这些数据将用于制定依从性阈值,确定改进领域,并在必要时制定纠正行动计划。

相似文献

1
A Multicenter Performance Improvement Program Uses Rural Trauma Filters for Benchmarking: An Evaluation of the Findings.一项多中心绩效改进计划使用农村创伤筛选标准进行基准评估:结果评价
J Trauma Nurs. 2018 Mar/Apr;25(2):139-145. doi: 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000337.
2
A Statewide Collaboration: Ohio Level III Trauma Centers' Approach to the Development of a Benchmarking System.一项全州范围的合作:俄亥俄州三级创伤中心开发基准系统的方法。
J Trauma Nurs. 2016 Nov/Dec;23(6):376-379. doi: 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000249.
3
Delayed trauma team activation: patient characteristics and outcomes.延迟创伤团队激活:患者特征和结局。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Sep;73(3):695-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31825abf6f.
4
Redefining "dead on arrival": Identifying the unsalvageable patient for the purpose of performance improvement.重新定义“入院时已死亡”:为改善医疗绩效识别不可挽救的患者。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015 Nov;79(5):850-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000843.
5
Plotting performance improvement progress through the development of a trauma dashboard.通过开发创伤情况仪表盘来绘制性能改进进度。
J Trauma Nurs. 2014 Sep-Oct;21(5):209-15; quiz 216-7. doi: 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000067.
6
Rural Trauma Team Development Course decreases time to transfer for trauma patients.农村创伤团队发展课程缩短了创伤患者的转运时间。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016 Oct;81(4):632-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001188.
7
The impact of implementing a 24/7 open trauma bed protocol in the surgical intensive care unit on throughput and outcomes.24/7 开放创伤床位协议在外科重症监护病房对吞吐量和结果的影响。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Jul;75(1):97-101. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31829849e5.
8
Survival benefit of transfer to tertiary trauma centers for major trauma patients initially presenting to nontertiary trauma centers.原发于非三甲创伤中心的严重创伤患者转送至三甲创伤中心的生存获益。
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Nov;17(11):1223-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00918.x.
9
ATLS practices and survival at rural level III trauma hospitals, 1995-1999.1995 - 1999年农村三级创伤医院的高级创伤生命支持实践与生存率
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2002 Jul-Sep;6(3):299-305. doi: 10.1080/10903120290938337.
10
Patients with severe traumatic brain injury transferred to a Level I or II trauma center: United States, 2007 to 2009.2007 年至 2009 年期间,严重创伤性脑损伤患者转送至一级或二级创伤中心:美国。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Dec;73(6):1491-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182782675.

引用本文的文献

1
Obtaining feedback from patients and their family in the emergency department.在急诊科获取患者及其家属的反馈。
Afr J Emerg Med. 2023 Sep;13(3):177-182. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2023.06.002. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
2
The impact of interhospital transfer on mortality benchmarking at Level III and IV trauma centers: A step toward shared mortality attribution in a statewide system.探讨院间转运对三级和四级创伤中心死亡率基准的影响:在全州系统中实现共享死亡率归因的一步。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Jan;88(1):42-50. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002491.