Kozhimannil Katy B, Hung Peiyin, Henning-Smith Carrie, Casey Michelle M, Prasad Shailendra
University of Minnesota Rural Health Research Center, Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis.
Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut.
JAMA. 2018 Mar 27;319(12):1239-1247. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.1830.
Hospital-based obstetric services have decreased in rural US counties, but whether this has been associated with changes in birth location and outcomes is unknown.
To examine the relationship between loss of hospital-based obstetric services and location of childbirth and birth outcomes in rural counties.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective cohort study, using county-level regression models in an annual interrupted time series approach. Births occurring from 2004 to 2014 in rural US counties were identified using birth certificates linked to American Hospital Association Annual Surveys. Participants included 4 941 387 births in all 1086 rural counties with hospital-based obstetric services in 2004.
Loss of hospital-based obstetric services in the county of maternal residence, stratified by adjacency to urban areas.
Primary outcomes were county rates of (1) out-of-hospital births; (2) births in hospitals without obstetric units; and (3) preterm births (<37 weeks' gestation).
Between 2004 and 2014, 179 rural counties lost hospital-based obstetric services. Of the 4 941 387 births studied, the mean (SD) maternal age was 26.2 (5.8) years. A mean (SD) of 75.9% (23.2%) of women who gave birth were non-Hispanic white, and 49.7% (15.6%) were college graduates. Rural counties not adjacent to urban areas that lost hospital-based obstetric services had significant increases in out-of-hospital births (0.70 percentage points [95% CI, 0.30 to 1.10]); births in a hospital without an obstetric unit (3.06 percentage points [95% CI, 2.66 to 3.46]); and preterm births (0.67 percentage points [95% CI, 0.02 to 1.33]), in the year after loss of services, compared with those with continual obstetric services. Rural counties adjacent to urban areas that lost hospital-based obstetric services also had significant increases in births in a hospital without obstetric services (1.80 percentage points [95% CI, 1.55 to 2.05]) in the year after loss of services, compared with those with continual obstetric services, and this was followed by a decreasing trend (-0.19 percentage points per year [95% CI, -0.25 to -0.14]).
In rural US counties not adjacent to urban areas, loss of hospital-based obstetric services, compared with counties with continual services, was associated with increases in out-of-hospital and preterm births and births in hospitals without obstetric units in the following year; the latter also occurred in urban-adjacent counties. These findings may inform planning and policy regarding rural obstetric services.
美国农村县基于医院的产科服务有所减少,但这是否与分娩地点和结局的变化相关尚不清楚。
研究美国农村县基于医院的产科服务减少与分娩地点及分娩结局之间的关系。
设计、地点和参与者:一项回顾性队列研究,采用年度中断时间序列方法中的县级回归模型。利用与美国医院协会年度调查相关联的出生证明,确定2004年至2014年在美国农村县发生的分娩情况。参与者包括2004年所有1086个提供基于医院产科服务的农村县的4941387例分娩。
按与城市地区的相邻程度分层,产妇居住县基于医院的产科服务减少情况。
主要结局为县级(1)院外分娩率;(2)在无产科科室的医院分娩率;(3)早产(妊娠<37周)率。
2004年至2014年期间,179个农村县失去了基于医院的产科服务。在研究的4941387例分娩中,产妇平均(标准差)年龄为26.2(5.8)岁。分娩的女性中,平均(标准差)75.9%(23.2%)为非西班牙裔白人,49.7%(15.6%)为大学毕业生。与仍有产科服务的县相比,不毗邻城市地区且失去基于医院产科服务的农村县,在服务减少后的次年,院外分娩率显著增加(0.70个百分点[95%置信区间,0.30至1.10]);在无产科科室的医院分娩率显著增加(3.06个百分点[95%置信区间,2.66至3.46]);早产率显著增加(0.67个百分点[95%置信区间,0.02至1.33])。与仍有产科服务的县相比,毗邻城市地区且失去基于医院产科服务的农村县,在服务减少后的次年,在无产科服务的医院分娩率也显著增加(1.80个百分点[95%置信区间,1.55至2.05]),随后呈下降趋势(每年下降0.19个百分点[95%置信区间,-0.25至-0.14])。
在美国不毗邻城市地区的农村县,与仍有持续服务的县相比,基于医院的产科服务减少与次年院外分娩、早产以及在无产科科室的医院分娩的增加相关;后者在毗邻城市的县也有发生。这些发现可为农村产科服务的规划和政策提供参考。