Boerner Kathrin, Rodriquez Jason, Quach Emma, Hendricksen Meghan
Department of Gerontology, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA.
Department of Sociology, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA.
Geriatr Nurs. 2018 Jul-Aug;39(4):465-470. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2018.01.003. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
This study examined how the Medical Orders for Life-sustaining Treatment (MOLST) is implemented in two nursing homes in Massachusetts; one had primarily long-term care residents and high hospice utilization, the other had low hospice utilization and a high proportion of post-acute care residents. Qualitative in-person interviews with 21 staff members who had a role implementing the MOLST explored their experiences using the form in their daily work routines. Staff at both nursing homes described benefits of the MOLST such as providing guidance for staff and family. Yet, they also gave detailed accounts of challenges they face in implementing the form. They reported problems with the form itself such as confusing language and conflicting categories as well as a set of procedural challenges that undermined the timely completion of the form. The nursing home with more post-acute care residents faced more challenges with transferability of the MOLST to and from hospitals.
本研究考察了维持生命治疗医嘱(MOLST)在马萨诸塞州两家疗养院的实施情况;一家主要接收长期护理居民且临终关怀利用率高,另一家临终关怀利用率低且急性后期护理居民比例高。对21名在实施MOLST中发挥作用的工作人员进行了定性的面对面访谈,探讨了他们在日常工作中使用该表格的经历。两家疗养院的工作人员都描述了MOLST的好处,比如为工作人员和家属提供指导。然而,他们也详细讲述了在实施该表格时所面临的挑战。他们报告了表格本身存在的问题,如语言令人困惑和类别相互冲突,以及一系列妨碍表格及时填写完成的程序方面的挑战。急性后期护理居民较多的那家疗养院在MOLST往返医院的可转移性方面面临更多挑战。