Department of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Department of Health Care Administration, California State University, Long Beach, CA, USA.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Mar 1;7(3):255-263. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.83.
As middle-income countries become more affluent, economically sophisticated and productive, health expenditure patterns are likely to change. Other socio-demographic and political changes that accompany rapid economic growth are also likely to influence health spending and financial protection.
This study investigates the relationship between growth on per-capita healthcare expenditure and gross domestic product (GDP) in a group of 27 large middle-income economies and compares findings with those of 24 high-income economies from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) group. This comparison uses national accounts data from 1995-2014. We hypothesize that the aggregated income elasticity of health expenditure in middle-income countries would be less than one (meaning healthcare is a normal good). An initial exploratory analysis tests between fixed-effects and random-effects model specifications. A fixed-effects model with time-fixed effects is implemented to assess the relationship between the two measures. Unit root, Hausman and serial correlation tests are conducted to determine model fit. Additional explanatory variables are introduced in different model specifications to test the robustness of our regression results. We include the out-of-pocket (OOP) share of health spending in each model to study the potential role of financial protection in our sample of high- and middle-income countries. The first-difference of study variables is implemented to address non-stationarity and cointegration properties.
The elasticity of per-capita health expenditure and GDP growth is positive and statistically significant among sampled middle-income countries (51 per unit-growth in GDP) and high-income countries (50 per unit-growth in GDP). In contrast with previous research that has found that income elasticity of health spending in middle-income countries is larger than in high-income countries, our findings show that elasticity estimates can change if different criteria are used to assemble a more homogenous group of middle-income countries. Financial protection differences between middle- and high-income countries, however, are not associated with their respective income elasticity of health spending.
The study findings show that in spite of the rapid economic growth experienced by the sampled middleincome countries, the aggregated income elasticity of health expenditure in them is less than one, and equals that of high-income countries.
随着中等收入国家变得更加富裕、经济更加复杂和富有成效,医疗支出模式可能会发生变化。快速经济增长伴随的其他社会人口和政治变化也可能影响卫生支出和财务保障。
本研究调查了一组 27 个中等收入大国的人均医疗保健支出增长与国内生产总值(GDP)之间的关系,并将研究结果与经济合作与发展组织(OECD)集团 24 个高收入经济体的结果进行了比较。这一比较使用了 1995 年至 2014 年的国民账户数据。我们假设,中等收入国家的医疗支出总收入弹性将小于 1(意味着医疗保健是一种正常商品)。初步探索性分析检验了固定效应和随机效应模型规格之间的关系。采用具有时间固定效应的固定效应模型来评估这两个衡量标准之间的关系。进行单位根、豪斯曼和序列相关检验,以确定模型拟合度。在不同的模型规格中引入额外的解释变量,以检验回归结果的稳健性。我们在每个模型中都包含了卫生支出的自付(OOP)份额,以研究财务保障在我们的高收入和中等收入国家样本中的潜在作用。研究变量的一阶差分用于解决非平稳性和协整性质。
在抽样的中等收入国家(国内生产总值每增长 51 个单位)和高收入国家(国内生产总值每增长 50 个单位)中,人均医疗支出和国内生产总值增长的弹性为正且具有统计学意义。与之前的研究结果不同,该研究结果表明,收入弹性的医疗支出在中等收入国家大于高收入国家,如果使用不同的标准来组建一个更同质的中等收入国家群体,那么弹性估计可能会发生变化。然而,中等收入国家和高收入国家之间的财务保障差异与各自的医疗支出收入弹性无关。
研究结果表明,尽管抽样的中等收入国家经历了快速的经济增长,但它们的人均医疗支出总收入弹性仍小于 1,与高收入国家的水平相当。