Suppr超能文献

《预防性过敏原标识的后果:安全港还是不合理负担?》

The Consequences of Precautionary Allergen Labeling: Safe Haven or Unjustifiable Burden?

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Allergy and Immunology, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Food Allergy Research and Resource Program (FARRP), Department of Food Science and Technology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Neb.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018 Mar-Apr;6(2):400-407. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.12.025.

Abstract

Precautionary allergen labeling (PAL) also known as "may contain" labeling has been applied to many packaged food products around the world. PAL is a voluntary form of labeling whose original intent was to help ensure that packaged foods were as safe as possible for allergic consumers by alerting them to the possible presence of allergen residues resulting from the use of shared processing equipment, shared processing facilities, or other industry practices. However, the proliferation of PAL and the myriad of various phrasing used as PAL statements are confusing to consumers and serve to diminish their quality of life. Thus many allergic consumers are known to ignore PAL statements. Analytical surveys indicate that many PAL products contain no detectable allergen residues and are likely safe for allergic consumers. However, up to 8% of allergic consumers report having had reactions to the ingestion of PAL products. Clearly a better approach to labeling is needed that balances the health and safety considerations of allergic consumers with their desire to enjoy the widest possible array of foods available in the marketplace. This article presents an overview and discussion of the shortcomings of the current PAL system and explores why a new approach is required.

摘要

预防性过敏原标签(PAL),也称为“可能含有”标签,已在世界各地的许多包装食品上使用。PAL 是一种自愿形式的标签,其最初的目的是通过提醒过敏消费者可能存在由于使用共用加工设备、共用加工设施或其他行业惯例而导致的过敏原残留,从而确保包装食品对过敏消费者尽可能安全。然而,PAL 的扩散以及作为 PAL 声明使用的各种措辞的多样性,让消费者感到困惑,并降低了他们的生活质量。因此,许多过敏消费者都知道忽略 PAL 声明。分析调查表明,许多 PAL 产品不含可检测到的过敏原残留,对过敏消费者可能是安全的。然而,高达 8%的过敏消费者报告说在食用 PAL 产品后出现了反应。显然,需要一种更好的标签方法,在平衡过敏消费者的健康和安全考虑与他们希望享用市场上尽可能广泛的食品的愿望之间取得平衡。本文概述和讨论了当前 PAL 系统的缺点,并探讨了为什么需要一种新的方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验