Curcio Giuseppe
Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Front Public Health. 2018 Feb 23;6:42. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00042. eCollection 2018.
In the past 20 years of research regarding effects of mobile phone-derived electromagnetic fields (EMFs) on human cognition, attention has been one of the first and most extensively investigated functions. Different domains investigated covered selective, sustained, and divided attention. Here, the most relevant studies on this topic have been reviewed and discussed. A total of 43 studies are reported and summarized: of these, 31 indicated a total absence of statistically significant difference between real and sham signal, 9 showed a partial improvement of attentional performance (mainly increase in speed of performance and/or improvement of accuracy) as a function of real exposure, while the remaining 3 showed inconsistent results (i.e., increased speed in some tasks and slowing in others) or even a worsening in performance (reduced speed and/or deteriorated accuracy). These results are independent of the specific attentional domain investigated. This scenario allows to conclude that there is a substantial lack of evidence about a negative influence of non-ionizing radiations on attention functioning. Nonetheless, published literature is very heterogeneous under the point of view of methodology (type of signal, exposure time, blinding), dosimetry (accurate evaluation of specific absorption rate-SAR or emitted power), and statistical analyses, making arduous a conclusive generalization to everyday life. Some remarks and suggestions regarding future research are proposed.
在过去20年关于手机产生的电磁场(EMF)对人类认知影响的研究中,注意力一直是最早且研究最为广泛的功能之一。所研究的不同领域涵盖选择性注意、持续性注意和分散性注意。在此,对该主题最相关的研究进行了综述和讨论。共报告并总结了43项研究:其中,31项表明真实信号和假信号之间完全不存在统计学上的显著差异,9项显示随着真实暴露,注意力表现有部分改善(主要是表现速度提高和/或准确性提高),而其余3项显示结果不一致(即某些任务中速度增加而其他任务中速度减慢)甚至表现变差(速度降低和/或准确性下降)。这些结果与所研究的特定注意力领域无关。这种情况可以得出结论,关于非电离辐射对注意力功能有负面影响的证据严重不足。尽管如此,从方法学(信号类型、暴露时间、盲法)、剂量学(比吸收率-SAR或发射功率的准确评估)和统计分析的角度来看,已发表的文献非常 heterogeneous,使得难以对日常生活进行确定性的概括。提出了一些关于未来研究的评论和建议。