The Ohio State University.
J Clin Psychol. 2018 Sep;74(9):1583-1593. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22613. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
A large body of work suggests that cognitive reappraisal is an effective strategy for modifying emotional intensity. In addition, its habitual use has been linked to adaptive psychological functioning, operationalized as low levels of symptoms of psychopathology. However, little is known about the impact of cognitive reappraisal on behavioral aspects of mental disorders. For example, the experience of fear is often accompanied by the behavioral urge to avoid the feared stimuli. Although there is evidence to suggest that cognitive reappraisal reduces fear in the moment, there is less information about the impact on behavioral correlates.
To that end, we recruited 90 participants who experienced substantial contamination concerns (i.e., obsessive-compulsive disorder symptoms) and asked them to participate in exposure tasks that consisted of gradually coming into contact with contaminated objects (i.e., approach behavior). We randomly assigned participants to one of three conditions: (1) reappraise the emotion-eliciting stimulus, (2) reappraise their emotional response, or (3) no specific emotion regulation instructions.
Reappraising the stimulus, but not reappraising the emotional response, led to significantly greater behavioral approach (p = .02) than the no-instruction condition during exposure. There were no significant differences in subjective state anxiety between any of the conditions.
These findings suggest that certain types of reappraisal may lead to greater approach behavior during exposure even in the absence of subjective emotional changes. More broadly, they underscore the importance of examining the role of emotion regulation strategies (including different types of reappraisal) on the behavioral aspects of mental disorders.
大量研究表明,认知重评是一种有效策略,可以改变情绪强度。此外,习惯性使用认知重评与适应性心理功能相关,表现为精神病理学症状水平较低。然而,对于认知重评对精神障碍行为方面的影响知之甚少。例如,恐惧的体验常常伴随着回避恐惧刺激的行为冲动。虽然有证据表明认知重评可以减少当下的恐惧,但关于其对行为相关性的影响的信息较少。
为此,我们招募了 90 名经历过大量污染担忧(即强迫症症状)的参与者,并要求他们参与暴露任务,包括逐渐接触受污染的物体(即接近行为)。我们将参与者随机分配到三种条件之一:(1)重新评估引起情绪的刺激,(2)重新评估他们的情绪反应,或(3)没有特定的情绪调节指令。
与无指令条件相比,重新评估刺激而不是重新评估情绪反应导致在暴露期间行为上的接近行为显著增加(p=0.02)。在任何条件下,主观状态焦虑均无显著差异。
这些发现表明,某些类型的认知重评可能会导致在暴露期间更大的接近行为,即使没有主观情绪变化。更广泛地说,它们强调了检查情绪调节策略(包括不同类型的认知重评)对精神障碍行为方面的作用的重要性。