Hughes William E, Kruse Nicholas T, Casey Darren P
Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Abboud Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Exp Physiol. 2018 May 1;103(5):728-737. doi: 10.1113/EP086908. Epub 2018 Apr 15.
What is the central question of this study? We examined whether the mechanical contribution to contraction-induced rapid-onset vasodilatation (ROV) differed with age and whether ROV is associated with peripheral artery stiffness. Furthermore, we examined how manipulation of perfusion pressure modulates ROV in young and older adults. What is the main finding and its importance? The mechanical contribution to ROV is similar in young and older adults. Conversely, peripheral arterial stiffness is not associated with ROV. Enhancing perfusion pressure augments ROV to a similar extent in young and older adults. These results suggest that age-related attenuations in ROV are not attributable to a mechanical component and that ROV responses are independent of peripheral artery stiffness.
Contraction-induced rapid-onset vasodilatation (ROV) is modulated by perfusion and transmural pressure in young adults; however, this effect remains unknown in older adults. The present study examined the mechanical contribution to ROV in young versus older adults, the influence of perfusion pressure and whether these responses are associated with arterial stiffness. Forearm vascular conductance (in millilitres per minute per 100 mmHg) was measured in 12 healthy young (24 ± 4 years old) and 12 older (67 ± 3 years old) adults during: (i) single dynamic contractions at 20% of maximal voluntary contraction; and (ii) single external mechanical compression of the forearm (200 mmHg) positioned above, at and below heart level. Carotid-radial pulse-wave velocity characterized upper limb arterial stiffness. Total ROV responses to single muscle contractions and single external mechanical compressions were attenuated in older adults at heart level (P < 0.05); however, the relative mechanical contribution to contraction-induced peak (46 ± 14 versus 40 ± 18%; P = 0.21) and total (37 ± 21 versus 32 ± 18%; P = 0.27) responses were not different between young and older adults. Reducing or enhancing perfusion pressure altered ROV responses to a similar extent between young and older adults (P < 0.05). Upper limb arterial stiffness was not associated with peak (r = 0.02; P = 0.93) or total vascular conductance (r = -0.01; P = 0.96) in the group as a whole. Our data suggest that: (i) age-associated attenuations in ROV are not attributable to a mechanical component; (ii) enhancing perfusion pressure augments ROV to a similar extent between young and older adults; and (iii) basal upper limb arterial stiffness is not associated with the vasodilator responses after a single skeletal muscle contraction in young and older adults.
本研究的核心问题是什么?我们研究了收缩诱导的快速血管舒张(ROV)的机械作用是否随年龄而不同,以及ROV是否与外周动脉僵硬度相关。此外,我们还研究了灌注压力的调节如何影响年轻人和老年人的ROV。主要发现及其重要性是什么?年轻人和老年人中ROV的机械作用相似。相反,外周动脉僵硬度与ROV无关。提高灌注压力在年轻人和老年人中对ROV的增强作用程度相似。这些结果表明,与年龄相关的ROV减弱并非归因于机械因素,并且ROV反应独立于外周动脉僵硬度。
收缩诱导的快速血管舒张(ROV)在年轻人中受灌注和跨壁压力调节;然而,在老年人中这种作用尚不清楚。本研究探讨了年轻人与老年人中ROV的机械作用、灌注压力的影响以及这些反应是否与动脉僵硬度相关。在12名健康年轻人(24±4岁)和12名老年人(67±3岁)中测量前臂血管传导率(每分钟每100 mmHg毫升数),测量过程如下:(i)以最大自主收缩的20%进行单次动态收缩;(ii)在前臂高于、处于和低于心脏水平处进行单次外部机械压迫(200 mmHg)。颈动脉-桡动脉脉搏波速度表征上肢动脉僵硬度。老年人在心脏水平时,单次肌肉收缩和单次外部机械压迫引起的总ROV反应减弱(P<0.05);然而,年轻人和老年人之间收缩诱导峰值(46±14%对40±18%;P=0.21)和总反应(37±21%对32±18%;P=0.27)的相对机械作用并无差异。降低或提高灌注压力在年轻人和老年人中对ROV反应的改变程度相似(P<0.05)。在整个研究组中,上肢动脉僵硬度与峰值(r=0.02;P=0.93)或总血管传导率(r=-0.01;P=0.96)无关。我们的数据表明:(i)与年龄相关的ROV减弱并非归因于机械因素;(ii)提高灌注压力在年轻人和老年人中对ROV的增强作用程度相似;(iii)年轻人和老年人单次骨骼肌收缩后的基础上肢动脉僵硬度与血管舒张反应无关。